Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Dell Censors IdeaStorm Linux Dissent

Posted by kdawson on Thu Mar 01, 2007 01:12 PM
from the why-bother? dept.
thefickler writes "It seems pointless to seek ideas and feedback if you're going to ignore and delete the opinions you don't like. That's exactly what Dell is doing with its IdeaStorm website, which the company set up to solicit such ideas and feedback. Dell deleted a post linking to an article that criticizes its handling of the 'pre-installed Linux' issue."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Linux: Pre-Installed Linux Tops Dell Customer Requests 509 comments
dhart writes "Within only a few days of Dell opening a new customer feedback website, they discovered that the feature most requested (by an almost 2-to-1 margin!) is an option on all new Dell PCs: pre-installed Linux. (And the number 3 request is pre-installed Open Office.) I believe they'll have a harder time now with the tired old mantra 'There's no customer demand for Linux.'"
[+] Linux: Dell To Linux Users — Not So Fast 356 comments
PetManimal writes to tell us that after all the hubbub over Dell's note about manufacturing Linux-friendly Dells and choosing distros, the company is now telling users not to expect factory-installed Linux laptops and desktops anytime soon. According to the article, Dell says that lining up certification, support, and training will 'take a lot of work.' "The company said today that the note was just about certifying the hardware for being ready to work with Novell SUSE Linux, not an announcement that the computers would be loaded and sold with the operating system in the near future..."
[+] Linux: Helping Dell To Help Open Source 177 comments
Glyn Moody writes "Dell's IdeaStorm is turning into a fiasco — for Dell, and for open source as well. Instead of just shouting at the company to sell pre-installed GNU/Linux systems, how about helping them find a way to do it? Here's a suggestion that I've posted on the IdeaStorm site: that Dell set up an independent business unit for GNU/Linux systems, just like The Innovator's Dilemma tells us to do when faced with a disruptive technology."
[+] Technology: OpenOffice.org Tries to Woo Dell 316 comments
Rob writes "OpenOffice.org project members have written to Dell (pdf), hoping to persuade the company to adopt OpenOffice in response to customer demand. John McCreesh, OpenOffice.org marketing project lead, writes 'Let's have a conversation about how we could build an OpenOffice.org supplied by Dell product to give your customers what they are asking for.' Demand for open source products on Dell's IdeaStorm web site prompted the letter. A somewhat obvious question is raised: why isn't OpenOffice already available by default on new PC's and Workstations?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Ahh. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:14PM (#18196646)
    See something you don't like? Suppress it!

    Go ahead, mod me down, fuckers. Your mother is a Java programmer.
    • Go ahead, mod me down, fuckers. Your mother is a Java programmer.
      Oh yeah! Well, your dad thinks Windows 3.1 is an operating system! And your mother likes coding in BASIC! And I'm not even going to begin with what you and your sister do every night in the basement with that Amiga!
    • by billybob2 (755512) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:33PM (#18196924)
      Dell is paying consumers to use Windows! The exact same Dell Latitude D520 Notebook costs $48 MORE if it comes with no operating system than if it comes with Windows.

      The laptop loaded with Windows XP [dell.com] costs $699, while the same laptop and configuration loaded with no operating system [dell.com] costs $747. Note that you must change the following two hardware options on the web page showing laptop without an OS so that they match the hardware options found by default for the Windows laptop: Hard drive=60GB 5400RPM and Modular Bay Optical="8X DVD".

      So it seems that Windows has a negative price tag as far as Dell is concerned! It looks like Dell is still subsidizing Microsoft for every Windows-free laptop they sell. I'm getting my laptop from System76 [system76.com] -- they sell excellent quality Linux laptops, desktops, and servers. They also have a great support team [ubuntuforums.org] that cares about Linux and open source.
      • "they sell excellent quality Linux laptops, desktops, and servers."
        Just curious. Have you already purchased systems from them? How did you come to this conclusion?

        Thanks
      • by bberens (965711) on Thursday March 01 2007, @02:33PM (#18197844)
        pre-loaded windows systems come full of advertisement crap such as free AOL installs which will dramatically decrease the cost of the PC to you and me. This is one of the many ways PC manufacturers keep the cost of the machine down. It's very likely that the advertising revenue is greater than the pittance they pay for the OS in their ginormous OEM contract so it doesn't surprise me at all. There won't be any advertising software in that machine with no OS and there's unlikely to be advertising software pre-loaded onto a linux machine. It's unlikely to be a major conspiracy, occam's razor and what not. Alternatively, maybe they could start selling PCs with a giant AOL logo on the side of the case. I'm sure that would go over well.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Is it not Dell's right to remove anything that they feel is negative coverage on their own website? As much as I want to get behind this "damn the man" smear job (not). I'd like to think that fellow Slashdotters understand that it is not in Dell's interest to try and make Linux available to the masses. It's a headache from a support standpoint. Though their management may be a little heavy handed for our liking we cannot blame them for not allowing participants of IdeaStorm to cross-link to articles critici
      • Re:Ahh. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by jc42 (318812) on Thursday March 01 2007, @02:24PM (#18197700) Homepage Journal
        Is it not Dell's right to remove anything that they feel is negative coverage on their own website?

        Yes, of course they have the right to suppress whatever they want on their own stuff. In fact, we should expect this from most organizations run by humans.

        But many of us would really like to know when this is happening. It tells us a lot about the trustworthiness of their information. If an organization (corporation, government, whatever) wants our trust, they should make their information handling "transparent" and visible to us. Otherwise, we'll just infer that they have something to hide from us.

        Nobody with a grain of sense ever trusts any organization that hides or suppresses information about their inner workings. (And yes, this does mean that I don't trust very many organizations. We have words for someone who does. Words like "naïve" and "sucker". ;-)
  • Dude (Score:4, Funny)

    by smitty97 (995791) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:15PM (#18196656)
    Dude, you bought a [DELETED]
  • by pilgrim23 (716938) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:16PM (#18196668)
    Michael Dell is back as the Chairman... Steve Balmer is a chairman..

    chair and chair alike.....
  • Ideas or Criticism (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Ogive17 (691899) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:16PM (#18196670)
    I didn't read the article because for some reason it's blocked at work (we have odd filters), but it's possible the post containing the link didn't meet the requirements.

    If I asked for some ideas, I would be open minded about what I received. If I got complaints instead with no ideas (not sure if the link gave suggestions or just complained), I would also remove them to try and stop the forum from becoming a flame war.
    • by jimstapleton (999106) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:23PM (#18196796) Journal
      Synopsis: Dell would make some buisiness models "Linux Ready", and look into other models. They would pick SUSE as their distro of choice.

      Roughly the idea storm post I read (not the article, but it linked to it), someone decided to complain that.
      1) Dell wasn't providing Linux support for all models NOW
      2) Dell wasn't given a guranteed time frame or even a gurantee on making all models "Linux ready" or "Linux preinstalled"
      3) Dell picked SUSE, the Linux that pays MS.

      The persond didn't use profanity and wasnt exceptionally inflamatory given how ticked off he seemded, but at the same time, he was complaining that he wasn't handed the sun and moon on a silver platter right now.
      • Ahh, a linux snob!
      • Note: I don't agree with the censorship at all, but I do think that particular post was unreasonable. Given the low voting rate, I suspect a lot of others positive to the idea of Linux on Dells felt this way to some extent also.
      • The truth is that Dell could be giving him Linux today. Dell makes excuses about having to ramp up support. Dell has sold Linux before, they know how to do it. We bought a box from them. The support came from Red Hat, not Dell. The reality is that Dell wouldn't even be doing the OS support! They farm it out to Suse or Red Hat or whomever.

        Oh, but they have to guarantee hardware compatibility. Heck, I can do that in an hour or two. I build boxes all the time with info I get off the internet.

        The trut
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        he was complaining that he wasn't handed the sun and moon on a silver platter right now

        Amen to that. For example, on 2) how could Dell possibly give a timeframe on that without doing a huge job figuring out if there were drivers for all the hardware they ship. Perhaps there are many that simply can't do it, because there's no driver, there's IP issues and whatnot which means there's not going to be a driver unless Dell dedicates own staff to reverse engineer it. As for 1) and 3), why would they overload the
  • by MikeRT (947531) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:17PM (#18196698) Homepage
    So they deleted a post critical of them. The post then appeared on a private blog without risk of legal reprisal. No **rights** were violated unless this was allowed in the TOS, and even then those are rights granted by Dell at their site, not legal rights. It's stupid, tacky and self-defeating. I don't think anyone thinks this was a smart move on Dell's part, but it's not real censorship like what we fear. He is free to post the same post, 5x more vitriolic (provided it's all still true), anywhere he wants.

    Besides, who in their right mind thought this was something more than astroturfing on Dell's part?
  • Overstatement (Score:5, Insightful)

    by iamacat (583406) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:17PM (#18196714)
    It seems pointless to seek ideas and feedback if you're going to ignore and delete the opinions you don't like.

    Why, does asking for opinions imply that you agree to follow and publish every one of them? They might have had a different kind of feedback in mind, like new models with a different hardware feature set.
  • You know... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Otter (3800) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:21PM (#18196758) Journal
    To the degree that the goal is to persuade Dell to support Linux, reinforcing the impression that Linux users are a bunch of hypersensitive crackpots who think the world owes them everything seems counterproductive.
    • Nod. I do not see what the big issue is here. Sure, pre-installing beats certifying, but the latter is not a "double-shunning of the linux community". I would definitely go for a certified GNU/Linux computer without OS. That is a big step forward compared to an uncertified PC with Windows. For one, any recent enough distribution is almost guaranteed to pick up the hardware. Secondly, it opens up a new market for distribution-specific installation/support groups, which is how it is supposed to work in the fr
    • Re:You know... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:58PM (#18197296)
      Linux users are a bunch of hypersensitive crackpots who think the world owes them everything

      Now, you've hit the nail on the head.

      I know this is going to get modded down but I'm being very honest: The Linux community is turning into it's own worst enemy. Have it shoved in your face with all the fanatical zest of a religious cult visiting your home at 6am on a weekend morning is going to turn many many people sour to the message before it ever gets told.

      How many companies that are dealing with Joe Sixpack users really want to be aligned with a fringe group like the Linux community? Not many.
  • This is the way of corporate and web relations nowadays. Lets sum up in a list, shall we?

    1. Corporation screws customers
    2. Someone on the web blogs about it
    3. Social networking sites pick up on it
    4. Semi-mainstream media and maybe even real MSM pick it up
    5. Corp backpedals
    6. Everyone forgets about the transgression
    7. Profit! (for the corp)

    We don't even need ellipsis. We've been through this enough to know where the profit comes from at this point.
  • really, when was the last time that YRO had a positive story?
    • let's look shall we?
      http://yro.slashdot.org/ [slashdot.org]
      Dell Censors IdeaStorm Linux Dissent no
      MPAA Fires Back at AACS Decryption Utility no
      RIAA Announces New Campus Lawsuit Strategy no
      Patent Office Head Lays Out Reform Strategy maybe
      Politics: Canada Rejects Anti-Terror Laws YES

      so the last time was Feb 28th.. oh wait- that was yesterday!

      plus, positive is all in the spin of the matter at hand.

      the last one could just as easily been written as- Canada decides to allow terroists more privacy...
  • by BadAnalogyGuy (945258) <BadAnalogyGuy@gmail.com> on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:24PM (#18196804)
    I once went to a restaurant and ordered a steak, medium-rare. I know a lot of people would rather have their steaks cooked well-done, grey all the way through. I'm not one of them. I like the tenderness that a little undercooking provides. The blood filling the plate is a delectable gravy to be sopped up with some bread. There really isn't anything I like better than a thick slab of ribeye cooked crispy on the outside and pink all the way through.

    You can imagine my surprise when they delivered a mash of ground beef and some wretched oil-soaked fries on the side. I said to the waitress, this isn't what I ordered. She was unmoved. I demanded that I talk to a manager. This little pissant 20-something comes out and asks me if there is anything he can help me with. I shoved the order in his face and asked him if he thought it was a steak, medium-rare.

    No, sir.
    Then why the hell did you serve it to me? Are you telling me I can't order my meal the way I want it and expect a modicum of service?
    Sir, this is Burger King. You can have it your way, within the bounds of our menu.

    I suppose I should have gone to the steak restaurant if I wanted steak.
      • by truthsearch (249536) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:47PM (#18197126) Homepage Journal
        Hey, give BadAnalogyGuy a break. He's just trying to live up to his name.
      • by Mr. Underbridge (666784) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:51PM (#18197200)

        The red juice from a steak is not blood.

        Uh, yeah it is. What the hell do you think it is?

        If you are trying to cast Dell as analogous to Burger King then you're gonna have a hard time convincing anyone. You may not like the taste of Dell's "food" but they made of living off of "made to order" configurability. Dell pioneered that.

        His analogy's spot on. Burger King's motto, as he put it, is "have it your way." Now they at least assume that what you might want is at least roughly the same as most of their other customers, so if you come in and want anchovies on your burger you're SOL. Same with Dell. Yes, they do configure it for you, but there are limits to it and one of the limits they've chosen to set is they're not dealing with Linux for consumers. Quite frankly, I don't blame them.

        So I'd say the original analogy is correct. If the company in question simply doesn't sell what you want, buy from someone else. I really don't get the furor, it's not like Dell is the only computer manufacturer. And any Linux geek worth his/her salt is going to want to install their own thing anyway.

        If it's just about not paying the MS "tax," let's make that it's own issue.

  • by byjove (567441) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:24PM (#18196810) Homepage
    If there's censorship, why would the thread "Stop making excuses, and start paying attention. WE WANT LINUX!!!" still be live? [dellideastorm.com]
  • by blantonl (784786) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:24PM (#18196816) Homepage
    I think it is important for everyone to understand that First Amendment rights don't exist on Websites, blogs, and message forums. Those that own those communication platforms are free to delete or censure anything they feel necessary to maintain the spirit and intentions of both the supporting business and the site as a whole.

    What exacerbates the issue is whenever a moderation activity takes place against either the open source community, or the Linux community, the reaction is swift, dramatic, and overdone. OMFG my post was removed.. it is a conspiracy!!!

    So what! Dell removed a post on a site that was soliciting user input. Aren't there bigger problems in the world?

    If I asked you to come in my house, and provide me feedback on how my living room looks, and you responded "that's the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen," then I would probably censure you and throw you out.
    • If I asked you to come in my house, and provide me feedback on how my living room looks, and you responded "that's the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen," then I would probably censure you and throw you out.

      That's very rude of you. You ask someone to come over and give you their opinion for free, which you will then profit from by having a nicer house, and you kick them out because you don't like what they said?

      Given our current property laws, that is certainly within your rights. It is also within my rights to stand at the edge of a property waving a large sign saying "Rude person lives here."

      As always, freedom of the press only applies to those that own a press. Otherwise, you are free (for now) to go find a street corner and shout at passers by.

      I get the feeling that even complaining about this issue pisses off a lot of authoritarian-types. It seems there are a number of people in the world who really, really want everyone else to stop complaining about anything that might hurt the profits of a business. We should all just lie back and think of England.

      Businesses have a right to do certain things that piss us off. That does not mean that we have no right to complain about it. And the mere existence of other, larger problems in the world also does not remove our right to complain about this one.
  • by Silentknyght (1042778) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:24PM (#18196818)
    Did you read the post that was deleted? It's a brief post that came off as if it was written by an angry teenager. It smacked more of a personal attack than a cool-tempered, well-written, logical argument.

    There has to be some moderation of flame-bait and trolling posts on any forum. Moreover, the post was deleted probably by an overzealous moderator, rather than through some evil Dell mastermind with a conspiracy against linux.

  • The irony of the Dell+Linux camp is every linux fanboy swears up and down dell sucks and they would never buy one but at the same time think Linux is self defeating if Dell doesn't pre-install it.

    What is it? why let the tempers flair? If you can't be sincere about something without sounding immature, irrelevent and childish what is the sense of Dell even catering to you or justifying your actions by supporting them on their systems?

    Its dells forums, its dells channel of communication. They can do as they se
  • by lymond01 (314120) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:28PM (#18196870)
    I didn't see the original post that was deleted, but in general, you'll find, especially on public boards, that criticisms don't always fit under the category of ideas. Constructive criticism would do well on a board called IdeaStorm, but if you are simply saying "Your implementation sucks," it's not much of an idea.

    Again, didn't see the deleted post.
  • by twifosp (532320) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:29PM (#18196886)
    Look people this is not some grand case of censorship, it's moderation pure and simple and that is something Slashdotters should be able to appreciate. The site, idea storm, is a website soliciting ideas. It is NOT for posting criticisms and off-topic crap.

    This is the equivalant of a slashdot moderator moderating a post -1 off-topic or -1 troll. With the obvious exception is that there is no ability to read at -1 on dellideastorm.

    Ideas and suggestions are one thing. Posting an off-topic criticism is another.

    Note: I do not agree with the choice to remove the post. But I also understand the reasoning behind the decision.

    I swear, the bias and overeacting around here is as bad as fox news lately. Censorship... please. China has censorship. This little Dell forum moderation is peanuts compared to REAL censorship. Get a grip, Slashdot.

  • if you don't think Dell does it for you, go Apple, whitebox, closet scraping, whatever for your next peecee. if they don't catch on, they don't deserve to be around. witness compusa.
  • "It seems pointless to seek ideas and feedback if you're going to ignore and delete the opinions you don't like."

    Clearly they saw those criticisms, so I don't think they're being totally ignored. I'm willing to bet they're well noted as the concerns of a vocal minority. And there's the rub... Dell doesn't HAVE to do jack sh*t just to appease a few Linux activists. Their main business is going to remain, for quite a while, wintel machines. As to their website, it's their website, they can do whatever the h

  • Is there a pattern? The article mentions one deleted post, but there are several on the Dell site that are not exactly flattering, to say the least. Lots of people just went off on an anti-Dell rant, and had nothing constructive to say at all.

    Dell is right, in that it'll take a lot of work to get everything ready. If they sell it, they have to support it. That means training both sales and support staff; verifying what hardware has Linux drivers; etc. There is a LOT of work for them to do.

    I've always t
  • Apple's discussion groups, to name one, just because I'm familiar with it.

    "Censorship" is the wrong word because it refers to the removal of information by government officials, and as far as I know neither Apple nor Dell is the government, yet. (Not even Microsoft is the government. Yet.) I don't think the Terms and Conditions of company-sponsored forums generally include a Bill of Rights. Nor do they generally promise that you will be able to read everything that anyone else has posted.

    Infuriating? Sure.
  • troll (Score:5, Insightful)

    by melikamp (631205) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:40PM (#18197020) Homepage Journal
    The editors are feeding a troll again. Dell did not open this forum to get educated about the freedom of speech. They wanted people to tell them how they can "improve [their] products and services". Pretty clear, is it not? An inflammatory comment about their way of supporting GNU/Linux does not belong there. Read TFA, the author makes it sound like Dell is spitting on the GNU/Linux community by opting to (gasp) certify the hardware rather than install and support some random distribution.
  • It seems pointless to seek ideas and feedback if you're going to ignore and delete the opinions you don't like.

    It certainly is annoying to those, who posted the removed feedback, but it is not at all pointless for Dell to do so. They've received it and read it. They may remove it to make themselves look better (or try to, rather), or they may simply want to filter (what they perceive as garbage) out.

    Their point may have've been to get ideas they would like — removing others may make sense.

  • Censor this (Score:4, Interesting)

    by jamesl (106902) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:43PM (#18197066)
    One man's censor is another man's editor.
  • The post in question is a semi-incoherent rant. If I didn't want to offer Linux, I'd keep it up and point to it, saying, "this is what we'd have to deal with if we supported Linux."

    If he simply said that Dell reneged on a promise; or that it was making a mistake by not offering Linux preinstalls, I could see a nefarious PR motive behind dropping the post. But it sounds like it was written by a manic depressive who's of his meds.
  • Huh? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Blakey Rat (99501) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:48PM (#18197146)
    It seems pointless to seek ideas and feedback if you're going to ignore and delete the opinions you don't like.

    Maybe it's pointless but everybody does it all the time. Half the time, if I say, "hey, what do you think of X?" I'm looking for, "X is really great, you did a good job on it." It's psychological, don't tell me you don't do the same.

    Dell deleted a post linking to an article that criticizes its handling of the 'pre-installed Linux' issue.

    Sounds to me that they deleted a post linking to a whiny bitch. Let's try this little summary mixer;

    "It seems pointless to submit ideas and feedback to Dell if you're going to write a whiny article because they don't do exactly what you want."

    Besides, Dell is a huge corporation. They're investigating a process to get their hardware approved by Linux distributers. For a huge corporation, that's a major undertaking... I'm sure whoever wrote that whiny article was looking for, "yes sir, we'll have those on shelves tomorrow!" as a response.
  • by Animats (122034) on Thursday March 01 2007, @01:51PM (#18197186) Homepage

    The reason this matters is that there are no Linux laptops available from any vendor bigger than a garage shop.

    Yes, there's Linux Certified [linuxcertified.com], in the same building with Mr. Chau's Chinese Fast Food [yelp.com] in San Jose. And there's System76 [system76.com], whose address is a Pak Mail in Denver. [pakmail.com]

    If you're selling hardware that may have to be maintained or replaced, you need to be bigger than that to play.

    Of course, once upon a time there was VA Linux, but we know what happened to them. [wikipedia.org]

  • by Greyfox (87712) on Thursday March 01 2007, @02:39PM (#18197940) Homepage Journal
    Seems like we get all excited about some linux strategy or other over there and then they come out a week later and say "No no we're not really doing that for YOU! Just our customers whose sales figures look like a phone number."

    From my personal experience we don't need no freaking support from them anyway. The last Dell laptop I used didn't completely blow donkey balls when I installed Linux on it. I was able to get high resolution, the docking station, wireless and the ethernet cards to work and was able to spin the fans up from sofware for when I ran Wine (Which always seems to want to cause a meltdown.) It also didn't give me third degree penis burns when I tried to use it in my lap. You always had plenty of warning when Wine was heating the machine up to penis boiling temperatures.

    I don't see why their company policy with Linux can't just be "Probably won't suck donkey balls. Won't boil your penis," and leave it at that. I mean really, we're linux people, what more do we really need?

    Of course these days I'm quite happy with the PPC Powermac I use. It never gets more than warm, wireless and ssh worked right out of the box and I didn't feel a burning urge to replace the OS the moment I turned it on. So sorry, Dell, even though your product doesn't suck donkey balls and doesn't boil my penis, the guys with the black tee shirts and the hair mousse still win.

  • by hcmtnbiker (925661) on Thursday March 01 2007, @02:44PM (#18198032)
    I'm calling Bullshit. Its still there [dellideastorm.com] About 2/3 of the way down the page. People really need to do just a little research before comming to these assumptions. It just got bumbed off the main page on the hacked down main page because they cant fit all of the comments there.