Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

The Pirate Bay Is Back Online

Posted by timothy on Sat Jun 03, 2006 07:37 AM
from the have-those-responsible-been-sacked? dept.
Many readers have submitted news that The Pirate Bay is back online, operating for now as "The Police Bay." Writes one anonymous submitter: "Pirate Bay got new hardware, moved the servers abroad and used recent backups. So the only bad side-effect of this police raid is that hundreds of clients of the ISP PRQ still have not got their servers back from the police. When the police did the raid on Wednesday, they took Pirate Bay from Bankgirot's secure server room. Then they also took all the servers in PRQ colocation facility STH3, effectively disabling a lot of small companies. The connection between PRQ and TPB? - Same owners, nothing more, this is beginning to become a huge scandal in Sweden with coverage on TV and all newspapers 4 days in a row."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] News: Digital Media Winners and Losers of 2006 36 comments
An anonymous reader writes "MP3 Newswire released its annual list of winners and losers in digital media for 2006. Winners include Azureus, the Pirate Bay, and YouTube. The losers list includes Streamcast, Captain Copyright (and his sidekick Lieutenant Lame), and the Online Guitar Archive. At the bottom of the post are links to past year's winners and losers lists."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by oberondarksoul (723118) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:40AM (#15461115) Homepage
    So soon they crowed victory, so soon will they be humbled. By the looks of things the takedown of the Pirate Bay was less than legal, and now with the 'Bay back online the MPAA must be feeling more than a little upset. Personally I'm of the view that the Pirate Bay was perfectly legal - they didn't carry any copyrighted works themselves, just as Google don't carry the materials they link to. What fun this whole affair will turn out to be...
    • by Dredd13 (14750) <dredd@megacity.org> on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:06AM (#15461206) Homepage
      Pirate Bay is *more* legal than Google. Google at least exists in this "grey area" -- with things like Google Cache, and things like that, where they actually DO distribute the actual copyrighted content themselves occasionally. Nothing that the Pirate Bay serves up is actually copyrighted, since it's just .torrent files.
        • by Dredd13 (14750) <dredd@megacity.org> on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:22AM (#15461265) Homepage
          Exactly which law makes torrent files illegal? Please be prepared to cite chapter and verse.
            • by cduffy (652) <charles+slashdot@dyfis.net> on Saturday June 03 2006, @09:04AM (#15461416)
              The US has laws explicitly addressing "contributory infringement", where one assists others engaging in copyright infringement but doesn't do so themselves. Sweden doesn't. EOM.
            • by linvir (970218) * on Saturday June 03 2006, @09:10AM (#15461432)
              Your analogy sucks balls. The Pirate Bay would be more analogous to a gun distributor, with the actions of gun owners as their own responsibility. And even then the analogy only sucks balls a tiny bit less. In Anarchist Slashdot, balls suck analogies.
            • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2006, @09:28AM (#15461512)
              I don't under stand the finger analogy. Please use one involving a car.
            • You know, ordinarily, police would love it if someone was distributing locations and phone numbers for drug dealers. Why doesn't the *AA thank them for giving them the IP addresses of illegal filesharers?
              • by giorgiofr (887762) on Saturday June 03 2006, @09:47AM (#15461588)
                Wrong guess, I'm from the EU. My understading of copyright law in a foreign country a few Km away from me is not that bad, especially when I've been reading a bit about it. What you and your trolling friends refuse to admit is that TPB encourages and facilitates sharing copyrighted material. I will continue to use it no matter what Swedish law says (is it OK, is it not? Like I care...) but I will NOT kid myself into believing that TPB knows nothing about the Windows ISOs you can download thanks to their portal. The post I replied to was trying to get away with a ridiculous technicality which didn't make any sense, that's why I compared to another nonsensical one.

                The police raid of TPB (at the direction of the United States) is widely believed to have been illegal under the laws of the country in which the raid took place. Attempting to applying U.S. legal theory to the situation does not magically change the jurisdiction.

                Yeah, so what? I don't care about the raid, I am simply pointing out that TPB is happy to help with piracy. They don't host the material, OK. They're in the clear wrt Swedish law, OK. So what? It does not mean you can pretend that piracy does not take place thanks to their portal. Then if their law allows this, more power to them.

                Why does the United States and some of its citizens believe respecting the sovereignty of nations is optional?

                I don't know, ask an American. In the meantime, were you in favour or against the bombing raids on Milosevic? What do you think of regulating the activity of farmers in my country so that the farmers in yours get a better/worse ROI? And I could make countless examples... Don't believe Europe is immune to this kind of games. The USA are definitely not alone.
  • The Top ten (Score:5, Funny)

    by yoharryo (874777) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:41AM (#15461116) Homepage
    Nice to see an illegal copy of Vista is number one...
  • Looks like the Swedish Police is making a free, wide and very positive campaign to favor the Piracy Party. I bet they will be getting a lot more votes thanks to this weird operation. Thank you Swedish police officers!
  • by LinuxGeek (6139) * <linuxgeek&djand,com> on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:43AM (#15461123)
    So, at what point does it become the responsibility of the police to do enough homework to make sure that their investigation dosen't harm many other businesses that are completely uninvolved in the search for evidence? What recourse do the other effected isp customers have?
      • by Depili (749436) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:09AM (#15461213)

        Remember that this is Sweden, not USA we talking about, in here the police doesn't have any more leeway when it comes to laws than normal citicens. (Ever so often we get to read about wich high up police officer got how big traffic tickets etc [the fines are based on income rather than being a fixed sum]).

        So please try to remember that not every contry works the same as America (and I'm really happy that it's so, frankly America and the American mentality scares me.)

      • by Svartalf (2997) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:25AM (#15461276) Homepage

        Basicly, as long as the police are conducting an legitimate investigation you don't get anything.

        According to the Swedish news coverage, there is some legitimate doubts as to whether it was a legitimate investigation or not. Their laws don't make linking to infingements an illegality. As such, since The Pirate Bay didn't host anything that is illegal per Swedish law. Now, it gets even better than this. According to people over there the national police happen to keep whingeing about not having enough manpower, etc. to enforce problems like drug trafficing, etc. and little gets done about real problems- but they can muster 50(!) people to "bust" a place that doesn't do anything illegal per their laws as a result of pressure being put on them from MPAA and others in the US. It's my understanding that there's a lot of people pissed about it over there right now.
      • by tomhudson (43916) <hudsonNO@SPAMvideotron.ca> on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:31AM (#15461291) Journal

        Oh come on ... the video from the surveillance cameras shows they took their sweet time checking out the server racks. They didn't have to take all the hardware they took (and who the fuck needs to wear camo on a raid of a server room anyway?).

        The warrant was for seizing the servers hosting TPB; any seizure exceeding that was outside the scope of the warrant, and that's why they (the police and the minister of justice) are in the crapper - taking something that's outside the scope of the warrant is theft. That they covered the security cameras with garbage bags partway through just makes them look guiltier.

        So - either:

        1. the police couldn't properly identify the hardware in question, in which case they were incompetent, and should have called in someone with more expertise, or
        2. they could, but over-reached.
        3. they purposefully grabbed more than they were entitled to, hoping for a backlash against TPB for causing the inconvenience
        Those are the only options. How much you want to bet it was #3, seeing as politicians and the **AA were involved? This is a very public cluster-fuck, and someone will have to pay, both politically and financially.
      • by Znork (31774) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:38AM (#15461317)
        "(groundless searches, SLAP-style shutdowns, excessive destruction of property)"

        Both groundless searches and excessive destruction of property would be possible in this case; there has been no attempt whatsoever of the parties to in any way hide what they're doing, there has been public debate on the issue, there have been court cases giving credible support to the idea that linking is not infringement, everything's been open and available. Even seizing the actual pirate bay servers might be excessive, there is no grounds to suspect any destruction or tampering with evidence would be done; the parties in question do not consider their content illegal.

        Basically it reeks of intimidation. Anyone around you doing something the MPAA doesnt like? Never mind if it's illegal or not, better get them to stop, or _you_ will be targeted. Collective punishment without due process.

        They even took DNA from the _legal counsel_. In a possible contributory IP infringement case?? What are they going to use that for? As it has no value as evidence whatsoever, one can only assume they're planning to place it on some other crimescene or hand it to foreign intelligence. I cant think of any reasonable reason to take it, so the conclusion has to be they have some unreasonable purpose.

        This isnt justice. This is state-sponsored political terrorism.
  • Examples Please! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kwandar (733439) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:43AM (#15461124)
    I can only hope this is causing a huge scandal s Sweden as stated by the article. Can any Swedish readers provides us a synopsis of some of the reports on tv and in the newspaper?
    • Re:Examples Please! (Score:5, Informative)

      by seezer (842248) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:01AM (#15461180)
      This guy http://tpbeng.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com] is translating local news to english.
    • Re:Examples Please! (Score:5, Informative)

      by Caine (784) * on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:09AM (#15461211)
      Virtually all major swedish newspapers (http://www.aftonbladet.se , http://www.dn.se/ [www.dn.se] http://www.expressen.se/ [expressen.se] http://www.svd.se/ [www.svd.se] are leading with the "Pirate War" and news that Pirate Bay is back online.

      Media coverage have so far been very good, concentrating on the mismanaged raid, suffering of other hosted servers and the fact that the raid was not in line with the popular will.

      Swedish state television have also done a news report connecting US lobbying and the swedish minister of justice to the raid, which is seen as extremly bad. Several other politicians and the justice ombudsman have started investigation into the legality of the raid.
    • Re:Examples Please! (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Hinhule (811436) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:15AM (#15461236)
      There have been numerous articles showing both sides of the story, often in the same newspaper.

      The swedish national TV station (funded by every household with a TV) ran a story based on an informant, basicly saying that the minister of justice was running errands for the white house. Ordering the takedown of the pirate bay even though prosecutors had already looked into it and found that they couldn't justify a takedown. The minister of justice and his departments actions are currently being investigated.

      There have been an online poll showing that about 87% think that music copying is ok. Most people also think that music piracy would go down significantly if a music CD had a resonable price.

      Oddly there have been no mention what people think of actual programs and games being copied. So as far as the masses are concerned they think TPB is used only to copy music and movies.

      I would like there to be an article around the fact that if TPB is found guilty of assisting copyright violations. Where do you draw the line? What about google or any other search engine? What about community sites, several cases of rape and pedophilia has been caused by connections made on such sites, are they assisting these crimes as well?

      Lots of people are outraged that the police already low resources are being wasted on copyright violations when people don't want to go alone at night out of fear of rape / muggings.

      All in all I think the media coverage have been better than expected.
  • Amazing! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Sj0 (472011) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:45AM (#15461135) Homepage Journal
    If it's turning into a major scandal, could this mean that people in Sweden generally don't think gestapo-like tactics are justified to take down a few people downloading video games and TV shows?

    Next thing you know, you'll be telling us that talking about war isn't actually talking about peace, and that freedom isn't actually slavery.
    • Re:Amazing! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by skrolle2 (844387) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:05AM (#15461203)
      Usually when the police over here is covered in media, they are complaining about lack of funds, there are too few policemen, minor crimes go uninvestigated, and the general feeling is that the police doesn't do its job.

      And now the police did a large-scale raid, not against drug smugglers, traffickers or other organized crime which people actually care about, but against file-sharers. As a result of a direct order from the minister of justice (who btw is not allowed to do that), and as a result of pressure from a foreign power.

      So we have a situation where the police doesn't have manpower to do what people want, but when the US wants to shutdown a legal Swedish site, there's suddenly plenty of resources available. THIS pisses people off enormously. The average Joe couldn't care less about copyright or filesharing or the Pirate Bay, but this blatant misuse of the police is something a lot of people care about.
      • Well duh... (Score:5, Funny)

        by raehl (609729) <raehl311.yahoo@com> on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:54AM (#15461368) Homepage
        Software pirates don't have guns.

        This wouldn't have happened if those network admins were armed.
        • Helping someone to break a law is in itself illegal.

          Contributory infringement has to be direct, not indirect. Pointing someone to a computer that has a chunk of a file is indirect. Giving them that chunk is direct.

          The difference is important - otherwise, your electical company, your landlord if you rent/your bank if you have a mortgage, the company that made your computer, the chair you sit your ass in to type, and the boss who pays your salary so yo can afford all the shiny toys, would all be guilty of contributing to infringement, since without them you wouldn't be able to infringe the copyright. Oh, and the government as well, since they regulate the telecom industry and provide the environment that allows you to do all these things.

        • Copyright infringement is illegal.

          The devil is in the details. In this case, "most of the western world" would probably disagree quite strongly on a) what constitutes infringement, b) how long works should be protected for and c) what the punishments should be.

          For example, I doubt you'd find many people who think downloading a song that gets played ten times a day on free to air radio should be considered infringement. Similarly, you will probably not find a lot of sympathy for media companies claiming to be "suffering" from copyright infringement in the face of ever increasing profits and ever decreasing product quality.

  • by scredda (728677) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:49AM (#15461144)
    ..is available at YouTube [youtube.com]. For some reason the police covered the cameras with plastic bags halfway through.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2006, @09:18AM (#15461460)
      For some reason the police covered the cameras with plastic bags halfway through.

      Why would they do that? Do they have something to hide!?
  • Thank you, Sweden! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Atario (673917) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:49AM (#15461146) Homepage
    As an American who's disgusted with the current Copyright Cabal running roughshod all over everyone and everything, I'm glad there's somewhere in the world where this crap inspires the mainstream rage it should. GO GET 'EM.

    What's it like in Sweden? What's a nice time of year to visit? Are there programmer jobs available? Do you still have that bikini team [wikipedia.org]?

    Be seeing you...
  • Demonstrations (Score:5, Informative)

    by hanssprudel (323035) on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:49AM (#15461147)
    There will be demonstrations [piratbyran.org] in Sweden's largest cities this afternoon, condeming the actions of the Swedish police and department of justice in this matter. It is being co-organized by the Pirate Party, and the youth organizations of several mainstream parties from across the political spectrum.

    In Stockholm it starts at 15:00 on Mynttorget (right by parlament). That is in 15 minutes so hurry!

    In Gothenburg a demonstration will start at 16:30 on Gustav Adolfs Torg.
    • Re:Demonstrations (Score:5, Informative)

      by mkro (644055) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:15AM (#15461243)
      And if you agree with what they are doing and want to support them, here [thepiratebay.org] is the donation link. SMS donations work from several countries, and makes giving a few bucks quite hassle free. I did, and feel way better than after buying a ring tone this way.
  • How many.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2006, @07:52AM (#15461155)
    ..cops does it take to change a light bulb?
    50. One to do it and 49 to confiscate every other light bulb in the house as evidence.
  • Representatives from two major political parties in Sweden, Folkpartiet and Vänsterpartiet have filed formal complaints against the Minister of Justice and members of his staff.

    This has increased the general publics awareness of The Pirate Bay and probably increased the number of p2p users.

    A very nice shot in the foot for the Swedish Justice Dept., the police and our very "customer friendly" **AA organisations.
  • but if they are in the netherlands now, what is to stop the dutch police from doing the same thing?

    yeah sure, it's a giant game of whack-a-mole, but isn't the lesson here to do to thepiratebay what was done to napster?

    that is, when the riaa/ mpaa behead these entities, they go underground and become headless

    that is: no central server. thus, napster morphed into morpheus, kazaa, edonkey, et al

    which is the real lesson for the mpaa/ riaa: you don't kill this "infection", you only make is more resistant to your antibiotics

    the mpaa/ riaa is breeding superpiracy

    you would think that instead they would coopt the pirate bay, legitimize it

    but no, they have to fight where it would be wiser to collude. they just breed a stronger foe, drive this behavior further underground, and not stop one bit of it, and just make it much more difficult to ever stop

    their behavior is creating the culture of piracy. if they embraced and extended, instead of exterminate and berserk, the mpaa/ riaa would create a culture that would say "hey, this stuff is cheap, and high quality, and easily organized... why would i want to go to a bad quality copy of my media that is hard to find?"

    surely they see that that is all they are doing, no?

    they are digging their own graves

    you can't fight technological progress

    this genie is not going back in the bottle

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:03AM (#15461196)
    In Chaosradio International #009 [chaosradio.ccc.de] one of the maintainers of TPB called "Peter" mentions traffic data and server capability of TPB and also comments on the Pirate Bay induced traffic on the Swedish part of the internet. According to Peter, each of the Pirate Bay high end servers handles about 20000 connections per second. This kind of packet flow once brought the main router of one of the biggest Swedish internet service providers to its knees. The traffic volume to and from the Pirate Bay actually isn't very high, just a couple of gigabits per second. The induced traffic between the peers allegedly reaches 50% of the total Swedish internet traffic. Swedes can get 1Gbps connections to their homes and don't have to pay an arm and a leg for it. 100Mbps is quite common.

    The interview also covers the political environment and the internet culture of Sweden, and of course the raid.
  • not a victory (Score:5, Insightful)

    by plams (744927) on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:11AM (#15461221) Homepage
    These news may be great for filesharing people worldwide. But from a political point of view the Piracy Party has not won until the the servers are back up on swedish territory.
    • by babbling (952366) on Saturday June 03 2006, @10:51AM (#15461880)
      The MPAA, US government, and Swedish police took down the The Pirate Bay website. If I told you that was about to happen, you'd probably see it as a very bad thing for bittorrent file-sharers and Swedes.

      Instead, the action has been criticised in Sweden, gained the pirate party a lot more support and publicity, and the website has been put back up within about 2 days. Now it's hosted in other countries, and if any of those countries attempt to take it down, you can bet that it will again get widespread coverage in the news.

      The Pirate Bay has gone from being a website into an idea. The MPAA thought they could just take it down and that would be the end of it. Instead, it seems that any attempt to take it down just gets support for file sharers and causes copyright laws to be questioned. Other countries can take it down, too, but the Swedes have set an example - there will be political backlash every time someone tries to mess with The Pirate Bay.
  • Server logs? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:25AM (#15461277)
    The torrent files that the Pirate Bay hosts are, it appears, legal in Sweden. However, the copyright infringement being perfomed by the individuals who download those torrent files and use them to make unauthorised copies of other people's work is certainly not legal in Sweden.

    So, what's the likelihood that any records they may have kept of who's been committing copyright infringement are now in the hands of the Swedish police, the Antipyratbyran, and indeed the MPAA?

    Pretty high, I'd say. Expect more raids soon... but this time, targetting the people who are committing the actual crimes, rather than the people who are exploiting legal loopholes to facilitate them.
    • Re:Server logs? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2006, @08:31AM (#15461293)
      Listen to the interview [slashdot.org]. According to one of their admins, they don't keep logs. He specifically mentions that they aren't stupid like that.
  • by inerte (452992) on Saturday June 03 2006, @10:20AM (#15461730) Homepage Journal
    Quickly, citizens!

    The Pirates have gone global this time. They can change their port with the tidal waves of mind crimes and its nefarious actions.

    It's not time to save on resources. The criminals can move between countries in a matter of days.

    We need the help of a new super-hero [captaincopyright.ca] spotted in Canada previous week! Only him can track down the Pirates and sunk their ship of infringments around the Earth.

    Support the fantasy! Don't let our dreams die!

    Captain Copyright, our prays are with you. Save us from the Pirates!
    • by linvir (970218) * on Saturday June 03 2006, @09:24AM (#15461493)
      incredibly expensive shows like 24 and Lost WON'T EXIST if they can't make money
      Welcome to the world of tomorrow! They'll adapt their business model eventually, and they'll start making shows available online. Or they'll keep their hands clamped over their ears and shout "LALALALA!" louder and louder until they go out of business. You're one of these people who thinks that it's the customer's duty to give a shit about producers, and that's just not the way it's supposed to work.
    • by vertinox (846076) on Saturday June 03 2006, @10:26AM (#15461753)
      5) Slashdot sucks, because most people here don't see the immorality of file sharing, and don't see that incredibly expensive shows like 24 and Lost WON'T EXIST if they can't make money. We might actually be seeing the fall of good video programming. It may not exist in 10 years, except for amateur junk.

      You were pretty good up to this point...

      And I must say I support file sharing exactly for this reason.

      I want mass media to die an ugly death!

      Lost to me (although better than most other crap they put on television) still represents what makes me ill about television. Maybe I'm just bitter over "Enteprise's" failure or the cancelation of "Firefly" but I am disgusted by most cookie cutter music and lame stories that make no sense and waste millions of dollars to make movies and TV shows that are unoriginal and could be made by an ad lib script.

      The only thing I bother today is Adult Swim on Cartoon network because of the imported Anime... Heck... My movie collection is nothing but foreign films because some reason... When you don't have kiss butt to a hollywood director and fix script problems with CGI and million dollar actors... You are forced to make entertainment the hard way. (Which is why I love fan fics remakes of star trek).

      If these moguls lost quit making emo boy bands and crap movies... The world would be a better place.

      If no one made money from art, then only true artists would make art... Plain and simple. Of course they'd be starving and need patrons like they did in the Middle Ages, but Da Vinci made quite a living without the need for copyrights of his work.

      Maybe I'm an art house bourgeois uppity bastard who only like foreign films, but I'd like for one day in my life to be able to turn on the radio or TV and see something that is more than just "entertainment". I'd like to see art.
    • by xigxag (167441) on Saturday June 03 2006, @10:26AM (#15461758)
      1) TPB sucks, because they're just leechers making money off of other people's copyrighted work, all the while disengenuously crowing about "freedom".

      I suppose Used Booksellers are leeches in your eyes as well. Should we shut them down too?

      incredibly expensive shows like 24 and Lost WON'T EXIST if they can't make money.

      How does filesharing substantially hurt 24 and Lost? The shows have already aired and made their money by the time they get onto filesharing sites.

      Honestly, if networks and cable companies would get together and allow rebroadcasting on demand of major shows, the vast majority of people would simply do that if they missed a broadcast. Or they could allow downloading of the show off their website, complete with commercials, in a time-limited "secure" format that would expire, say, a month after initial broadcast date, so as not to interfere with DVD sales. Most downloaders would probably go for something in pristine quality that would be easy to locate and download, over the dubious quality of an anonymous fileshare.

      Anyway, the point is that this is not about making money. There are plenty of ways for them to make money off the internet with their shows, as they are beginning to discover. This is about control. The suits have shown over and over again that they resist any attempt to lessen their total control over the distribution of their product, even when it can make money for them. They have to be dragged kicking and screaming every step of the way.