TiVo vs EchoStar - TiVo Wins 256
ssuchter writes "A jury just ruled in favor of TiVo in their suit against EchoStar, awarding TiVo $73M of the $87M they asked for. From the article: 'TiVo had sought $87 million in damages from the Dish satellite-TV network in a patent dispute that TiVo lawyers said could be "life or death" for the company that sold the first box for pausing and rewinding live television.'"
EchoStar was so shocked (Score:5, Funny)
Re:EchoStar was so shocked (Score:2)
Well, this saves Tivos butt... (Score:5, Insightful)
Bad thing is, the lifespan on a patent will probably make that what is right now good news, later becomes bad news
Re:Well, this saves Tivos butt... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Well, this saves Tivos butt... (Score:2)
Talk about kneejerk.
So why are you (and those people saying essentially the same thing a few posts later who really ought to be modded Redundant) defending TiVo that much?
Maybe because their thought process is a little more in depth than OMG PATENTS BAD. MUST KILL.
Idiot Lawyer (Score:5, Insightful)
"I don't think 190,000 people would have bought this particular toy if they could have gotten it free from their cable company."
no wonder they lost. I think that was TiVo's point, free boxes from the cable companies ( if you want to call subsidized by higher cable rates "free") cost Tivo sales.
Tivo boxes are free now (Score:2)
--
On another note, while this is a victory, it is not that much. 73 million does not go a long way now, however, it will stave off the Tivo is dead people because now Tivo will have some operating cash flow (assuming they get it quickly; with appeals, maybe in the next five years).
Re:Tivo boxes are free now (Score:5, Insightful)
But it's not about one settlement from Dish/Echostar. TiVo will make much more money licensing its patents, and selling its software and services. Five years down the road and the money TiVo will be making in new business will make this award money look like chickenfeed. It's about getting TiVo's patents enforced, and getting cable companies and satellite companies to do business with TiVo. It's the legal decision that matters, not the size of the monetary award.
Re:Idiot Lawyer (Score:2)
That didn't save Netscape. EchoStar should have "integrated" the box into their service and called themselves "innovative".
Re:Idiot Lawyer (Score:5, Insightful)
I have a simple rule: s/free/paid-for/g, in all promotional material.
Then you think about who is paying for it.
Every once in a while, the answer won't be "you, the customer", and that's when you should jump if you're interested. But usually, it's you.
Re:Idiot Lawyer (Score:2)
"Really, it's FREE?" said the second guy?
The first guy responded "Yeah. You just pay them $25 on the first day of the month, and it's free the rest of the days
More expense for the consumer (Score:2)
Shame there always has to be a trade off
Re:More expense for the consumer (Score:4, Interesting)
What is a big plus is that the chances are greatly increased that cable subsribers will have the option of using the vastly superior TiVo software on their cable DVRs (as will soon be the case for some Comcast subscribers), rather than the slapdash piece of crap DVR software that is currently offered to cable subscribers because the cable companies know the customer don't have any choice and don't know what they are missing. That will change, thanks to this legal decision.
Re:More expense for the consumer (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:More expense for the consumer (Score:2)
TiVo wins... (Score:2, Funny)
Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:4, Insightful)
Then so f'n long. Its not the job of the courts to make sure you remain profitable. Especially over their "time warping patent [taletyano.com]" which in a nutshell is "we patent computers recording tv video for later playback." Uhh, no. Hope you lose. There's a difference between first to market and innovation. They've been nice enough to stay away from MythTV but waiting on the niceness of corporations isn't what I call justice. Tivo's patent should be revoked. Hell, they havent made a profit in years (ever?) so these patents aren't exactly holding them together to begin with.
I'd rather kiss Tivo goodbye than anything that resembles a tivo (like mythtv) because of silly american patent law. If it takes another silly suit from echostar to question this patent, then all the better. No one else can afford to take Tivo on. There's no ACLU for ridiculous patents to fight the patent abusers.
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:5, Informative)
I just hope TiVO doesn't get greedy and either tries to become a) an honest corporate citizen and tries to make win-win licensing deals with their competitors, or b) realise that the money is in the "bits about bits" and that their real cash cow is the recommendation service and TV guide.
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:4, Insightful)
Take videotape out. Check. Put hard drive in. Check. Get patent. [taletyano.com] Check. Novel invention?
Recording television and watching it later. Hmm. I was doing this as a kid on my dad's old Betamax in the early 80s. Lets not push it here. Its a shame that companies like google and tivo have this geek halo around them, where we all just decide to give them a severe double standard. I'm certain if MS had this patent blood would be spilled by now.
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:3, Insightful)
You try taking a hard drive from 1997 and recording and playing back MPEG2 data in real time simutaniously on it. You already know they figured it out, and it would still be a challenge even if you were an expert (which it seems fairly clear you aren't since you con't grasp the complexity of the problem).
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:2, Insightful)
The difficulty of that in 1997 was a function of the crappy hard drives of the day. But what does that have to do with the current situation? TiVo's patent is still in force for hard drives that can easil
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:2)
As for the difficulty of doing it: it's not difficult at all, and in any case this is not relevant to the patent. They didn't patent a method of using a slow hard drive to time shift video. They patented any g
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:3, Insightful)
Recording and playing back video at the same time from the same hard dirve was both new and non-obvious when they filed the patent. I don't know why it's so hard for you to see that. There were plenty of experts in the field... People who made non-linear digital editing stations, etc... None of those people thought of it. There are other people who were making DVRs at the time, Echostar for example, and they didn't think of it until they had a Tivo to
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:2)
Re:Expected outcome, also expected to be appealed (Score:2, Informative)
"multimedia time warping system" (Score:5, Interesting)
What kinds of patents does TiVo actually have? Are things like MythTV at risk?
I have been considering writing my own Myth-like software. I would hate to get it shut down because of some stupid GUI patent or something.
Some of TIVO's US patents (Score:5, Informative)
US Patents
6,850,691 - Automatic playback overshoot correction system
6,847,778 - Multimedia Visual Progress Indication System
6,792,195 - Method and Apparatus Implementing Random Access and Time-Based Functions on a Continuous Stream of Formatted Digital Data (continuation of 6,327,418)
6,757,906 - Television Viewer Interface System
They also have exclusive licensing rights to
5,241,428 - Variable-Delay Video Recorder
Japanese Patents
3615486 - Multimedia Time Warping System
Chinese Patents
ZL 99804757.0 - Method and Apparatus Implementing Random Access and Time-Based Functions on a Continuous Stream of Formatted Digital Data (see US patent 6,327,418)
ZL 00805987.X - Data Storage Management and Scheduling System
This is of March 2005, they may have more since then. Also, if you want to search the text of the US patents, you can start here [uspto.gov]
Re:Some of TIVO's US patents (Score:2)
6,847,778 - Multimedia Visual Progress Indication System
[available in Quicktime and RealPlayer for over a decade]
6,850,691 - Automatic playback overshoot correction system
[this is unclear to me, is this to handle synching? there's been such corrections for year otherwise what the heck are they talking about?]
6,792,195 - Method and Apparatus Implementing Random Access and Time-Based Functions on a Continuous Stream of Formatted Digital Data (continuation of 6,327,418)
[Wasn't this done for digital data acces
Re:"multimedia time warping system" (Score:4, Funny)
-Peter
PS: Here I go again, proving there should be a "-1: I don't get it" moderation option.
I have a Dish Network PVR (721)... (Score:5, Informative)
But is doesn't have the nice features that TiVo has. I can't record all episodes of a certain show, I can only give it a time to record (and it doesn't auto adjust if a game goed long). I can't tell it to record everything for a certain actor. Amongst other things.
Now I never used a TiVo, but from what I have been told, the Dish PVR doesn't compete.
Re:I have a Dish Network PVR (721)... (Score:2)
I have the Dish 522 and -love- it. It records "new episodes" or all, or just some. Has priority scheduling, 2 tuners (record 2 shows at once while watching something else), etc, etc.
I may have to respect TiVo's patents, but I can't help but thinking that laywering up because you set your pricepoint too high for the cable companies to buy your technology really sucks for most TV consumers.
Re:I have a Dish Network PVR (721)... (Score:2, Informative)
Dish has gotten better, but they haven't even come close to the Tivo yet.
And yes, I am the current owner of 2 DirecTV Tivo units. I bought them after evaluating both Dish and DirecTv's DVR options.
I own a DishPlayer 924 (Score:2)
Dual Dish Tuner, Off-Air TV Tuner, plus 2 outputs - seperate remotes for each output...
Here's the cool part.
I can record off both dish tuners, the off-air tuner, and watch 2 previously recorded shows on the other outputs.
So essentially 5 different things going on at once.
And yes - you can configure Dish to record all kinds of ways.
#1 All episodes of a given show.
#2 All NEW episodes of a given show - ie - only
Re:I have a Dish Network PVR (721)... (Score:2)
Re:I have a Dish Network PVR (721)... (Score:2)
Re:I have a Dish Network PVR (721)... (Score:3, Informative)
And my wife, a big fan of 24, set a timer that records all episodes of 24, regardless of time
I hope this is upheld in the Appeals court. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I hope this is upheld in the Appeals court. (Score:2, Insightful)
they can die in a fire.
Re:I hope this is upheld in the Appeals court. (Score:2)
Nope...
Mixed Feelings (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand I'm not sure that what TiVO did wasn't obvious. Using a HD rather than a videotape was surely obvious and automating the process of recording shows is not only obvious but far from original. All TiVO did is put both of these things together in a convient package and I find it hard to formulate any principled rule that would call TiVO's developments non-obvious but NPT's blackberry patent obvious.
The difference seems only to be that geeks like TiVO and TiVO hasn't being suing individuals who decide to set up their computers to tape shows for them. But if they do get their patent enforced that is exactly what they *could* do in the future.
In the end I tend to think the TiVO patent should have been rejected as obvious. However, I think the only reason TiVO didn't make money is the monopoly cable companies and satellite companies have on their markets. When data service becomes the commidity everyone buys and there is free competition amount content providers on an open protocal companies like TiVO won't be shut out by monopolists who can make it difficult for TiVO to penetrate their markets.
It was the 'time warp' aspect (Score:2)
What came out at the trial was that echostar's original products did *not* have that functionality. They only incorporated that after getting their hands on a tivo system (which Tivo rather naively
Commercials (Score:2)
The fact that it wasn't yet on the market hardly shows that it wasn't obvious. It may not have been obvious that this feature would make a profit/be popular but the patent office doesn't grant patents on realizing that something would make money. The patent office grants patents based on the te
Re:It was the 'time warp' aspect (Score:2)
Clearly you agree that there was nothing non-obvious about the technical aspects of what TiVO did to someone skilled in the art of computer video. I mean this same technology has been seperatly developed tons of times so it would be pretty tough to argue this.
Thus at a minimum for you to be right it must not have occured to hundreds of EchoStar customers, 'hey wouldn't it be nice if I could record one program while watching another.' EchoStar could have not pursued it
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
This is like arguing that the first person to do multi-tasking on a PC deserves a patent for realizing that multi-tasking wasn't only something that supercomputers can do. Admitedly at that time it probably wasn't obvious that a PC had enough powe
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
Oh, ok. Guess it wasn't.
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:3, Insightful)
This is like arguing that the first person to do multi-tasking on a PC deserves a patent for realizing that multi-tasking wasn't only something that supercomputers can do.
No it's not. Nobody was doing rando
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
One major difference in my mind.. TiVo created the idea of a harddrive as a replacement for the VCR, and NPT created the idea for email from a handheld device. Both semi novel ideas, but ideas others have thought of before. TiVo created a great product that implemented this idea in a truly novel way that created MANY copyers. NPT created an idea and sat on it.
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
But it wasn't obvious when Tivo started. Otherwise, we would have already had it. Computers have been around for decades now. So have hard drives, video encoders/decoders, etc. All the parts were there, but the innovative idea to put them together in a new way and CHANGE the way we watched television... that was worth a patent.
And I mean "we" the masses, not "we" the bright hobbyists who were already dabbling with video capture
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
Under your argument Apple should get a patent for a windowing OS despite X/Xerox parc doing it first as they were the first ones to realize it might be profitable on PCs. Hell redhat should be able to get a software patent on Linux because they realized it was profitable to sell.
The patent system simply isn't supposed to work that way. It is only supposed to give patents tha
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:5, Insightful)
Given the difficulty in explaining what a PVR did, I don't think the idea is entirely obvious.
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:3, Funny)
Justin.
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
People make it seem like this is easy and obvious.
I hate to say it... but it is both easy and obvious. But that doesn't mean you can't get a patent for it, nor does it mean that the patent should not be upheld. I think this is a great day for patent law and a great day for Tivo. They said "Hold on, that's our idea, we had it, announced it and followed through with it first and here's our proof!" and deserve that credit and some kick back from everyo
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
However, I think it is inconsistant to cheer for TiVO winning their case but jeer at NTP or Amazon for their obvious patents. If we are going to bitch about people getting patents on obvious things we can't do it only when they are companies we don't like.
Re:Mixed Feelings (Score:2)
The patent office's reply is the standard
"If it were obvious there would be some prior art"
But I think you are missing the bigger picture. TiVO's patent is not obvious when you simply take a VCR and replace the tape with a hard drive.
It is a substantial engineering challenge (or was at the time) to pull a GByte of data off a hard drive in an hour, without emptying a buffer, at the same time that you are writing a GByte of data to the hard drive, without ov
Dish had a DVR 1st (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Dish had a DVR 1st (Score:3, Funny)
I found the hole in your argument.
DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:5, Informative)
So, given that such a large company had a 'similar' product on the market *before* Tivo, and it didn't have anywhere close to the functionality which Tivo patented, it would seem to be that the 'non-obvious' or 'novel' aspects of the patent got a significant boost. If it was such an 'obvious' way of performing this trick, the people with an earlier technology would have indeed developed the 'obvious' technique and used it in their product.
Re:Didn't have 'time warp' (Score:3, Informative)
Re:DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:2)
Re:DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:2)
That's not patentable either.
Re:DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:2)
>That's not patentable either.
Eh? Have you read In re Lowry?
Re:DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:2)
The thing is, if you give any competent engineer, who has never seen a DVR, the task of building a box with all these features, he'd build something that would work. He would not have to use Tivo's methods, he might even improve on them. Although in the case of Echostar, it seems that it's somewhat worse. That may have had something to do with the judgement
In the American patent system, there is a winner take all attitude. If two guys r
Re:DIdn't have 'time warp' (Score:2)
Then why didn't Echostar make it work? Their box could only record or playback. It couldn't do both at once until they had a Tivo to play with and copy. Or would your argument be that those guys who made a whole digital sattelite system from the ground stations to the sattelites, to the set-top boxes were incompetent?
Of course, any competent eng
I don't think this is a bad ruling and here is why (Score:5, Insightful)
Tivo has been compared to the VCR and with that logic, does not deserve patent protection. I disagree and believe that Tivo did innovate and does deserve patent protection.
What Tivo did first:
1) Downloadable program guide - Before Tivo, the only automated way to record was VCR+. It was lame and with TV Guide print deadlines 3-4 week before publish date it was shaky.
2) Digital recording - Though I agree that substituting a hard disk for a tape (media) may not deserve a patent, Tivo was the first successful use of mass market MPEG-2 recording. My tivo was 20 hours at first, this was an exponential leap. Tivo took open-source code (Linux), developed proprietary code and hardware, a dial-up infrastructure and made it work. They also, to the best of my knowledge, have honored the GPL and released their GPL tainted code back.
3) User interface - don't even try to tell me this is derivative of any VCR interface that exists today. Tivo's GUI is 6 years old and it still works well.
4) 30-sec skip, wish lists, filters, etc. might be considered standard now but when Tivo implemented them, they were revolutionary to the TV market and pre-digital TV.
I ABOLUTELY do not believe in patent protection where prior art exists or where it's basic physics or biology, etc. that someone is trying to patent. That said, I believe that Tivo innovated, took risk, and is trying to defend its investment and true intellectual property. This is what the patent system and at a more basic level, property rights are all about.
The real issue and problem is not Echostar, it is Hollywood and the MPAA. Tivo is the ultimate fair-use device. They deserve protection for their ideas and the right to survive in a FAIR market on their own ideas.
Re:I don't think this is a bad ruling and here is (Score:2)
Re:I don't think this is a bad ruling and here is (Score:2)
I think tvguide.com has the prior art there...
Since when did "successful" or "mass market" have anything to do with patents?
Good for them, but that's completely besides the point.
No, it's not like a VCR, it's mu
Checking it twice (Score:4, Insightful)
2) Digital recording - Though I agree that substituting a hard disk for a tape (media) may not deserve a patent, Tivo was the first successful use of mass market MPEG-2 recording.
As others have mentioned the original Dish Players had rudimentary recording before TiVo. They've been MPEG-2/DVB since inception.
4) 30-sec skip, wish lists, filters, etc. might be considered standard now but when Tivo implemented them, they were revolutionary to the TV market and pre-digital TV.
There were some VCR's on the market with a 30-second skip button.
Re:I don't think this is a bad ruling and here is (Score:3, Insightful)
There were both StarSight and VideoGuide, both sold in the mid 1990s before TiVo.
VideoGuide actually had a nice GUI interface with a comfortable simple remote. Except for the limitations of Tape (no random access, no way to delete shows or know what was on which tape), it was quite comparable to TiVo. It downloaded program guide data via a wireless interface (based on a pager network). You could buy the units at any RadioShack.
Re:I don't think this is a bad ruling and here is (Score:3, Insightful)
Tivo may well have thought innovatively, and be a great company -- but remember, you can't patent great ideas, and that's what exactly most of what you describe sounds like.
If they had a sufficiently non-obvious mechanism to implement some of their great ideas, they could patent the mechanism, but anybody else is quite free to come along and use a different method with the same result. Even if Tivo thought of it first.
Re:I don't think this is a bad ruling and here is (Score:2)
You haven't described anything that should be eligible for patenting. You don't get patents for making a widget that does X, you get a patent for the particular way in which it achieves doing X.
So ok, 30 second skip is a useful idea, it was new, I'm not going to debate if it's an idea or not. It doesn't matter - a valid patent would be one for the particular way they achieved doing a 30 second skip. And although I have no idea how the Tivo works, I don't believe their method of achieving that was unobvious
Google agrees (Score:2)
TiVo's exact patent (Score:2, Informative)
Re:TiVo's exact patent (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:TiVo's exact patent (Score:2)
Tivo's patent is for a specific method of doing this sort of juggling with one media device (a hard drive) which was non-obvious at the time (what? 8-9 years ago?) Patent's are not supposed to be just for an 'idea' but a specific implementation of an idea, which Tivo's is.
Re:TiVo's exact patent (Score:2)
Didn't this exist in the pro-editing space at the time? I thought TV production systems could do this (review while still recording) but it would be better if somebody with more experience in the field at the time could comment here.
Prior art from long, long ago (Score:5, Interesting)
It was meant for professional studio use, cost about $150K, and only held 100 seconds of video - but hey, that was 20 years ago. I'm not sure how Tivo can claim to have invented the technology.
Re:Prior art from long, long ago (Score:2)
How do you pronouce that? Abacus?
Re:Prior art from long, long ago (Score:3, Insightful)
Echostar has released a statement (Score:3, Informative)
April 13, 2006 - This is the first step in a very long process and we are confident we will ultimately prevail. Among other things, we believe the patent - as interpreted in this case - is overly broad given the technology in existence when TiVo filed its patent. We believe the decision will be reversed either through post-trial motions or on appeal. Additionally, the Patent Office is in the process of re-examining TiVo's patent, having determined there is a substantial question concerning the validity of the patent.
DISH Network subscribers can continue to use the receivers in their homes, including their DVRs. Furthermore, TiVo dropped their claim that EchoStar's Dishplayer 7200 DVR infringes their patent.
Bad news (Score:2, Insightful)
State Law: The damages will probably be reduced. (Score:2, Informative)
Newspapers almo
Re:State Law: The damages will probably be reduced (Score:4, Informative)
What about ReplayTV? (Score:2)
Re:ummmm no (Score:3, Informative)
They were both introduced the same year.
Re:ummmm no (Score:2)
If so, TiVo seems markedly less innovative.
Re:ummmm no (Score:2)
Re:Oh great.. (Score:2)
It might be more interesting if this gives DirecTV a nudge back to Tivo.
Re:Oh great.. (Score:2)
Re:Oh great.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Just Another Stupid Patent (Score:2)
What if Tivo dies or is harmed because of competition who are breaking the law? Where do you draw the line? What Tivo did *was* innovative and 'non-obvious' to people when they developed it. If you followed the trial and read some of the testimony, you'd know that Echostar had far greater resources to throw at the DVR space, and were working on products before Tivo, yet weren't able to deliver the functionality that Tivo did. If E
Re:Just Another Stupid Patent (Score:2)
It's clear from that comment that you have no idea what a TiVO does. Try one some time and then you can come back and tell us all how wrong you were.
Tivo doesn't record a show at a certain time. It manages and acquires content for you. It's nothing like a VCR in any way. Seriously, tr
Re:So, uh (Score:2)
Re:So, uh (Score:3, Insightful)
This is like saying the mechanisms of a specific electronic calculator shouldn't be patented because man had already invented the abacus.
I really hope they start selling a service though: Remote control design for dummies. The Tivo rem
Re:So, uh (Score:2)
Actually, it's like saying that adding one plus one on the calculator shouldnt be patented just because it could be done with a calculator instead of an abacus.
Tivo, while nice, just isnt particularly innovative. It's simply the packaging of various other technologies that just recently became practical for applying in this particular fashion. The ideas have been there f
Re:The judge owns a Tivo? (Score:2)
Let's just hope Echostar appeals and wins.
Re:The judge owns a Tivo? (Score:2)
I didn't short TiVo stock, though I probably should. What I'm bitter about is that I can't buy a viable DVR because TiVo makes/sells garbage and sues anyone who makes a decent one.
I'm also not hiding behind an AC posting. I guess you're embaressed to have people know you like TiVo.