Slashdot Log In
Software Patents Stopped in India
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu Apr 21, 2005 01:00 AM
from the no-means-no dept.
from the no-means-no dept.
piyushranjan writes "Indian parliament deleted the section from the patents bill regrading the software patents as left parties prevailed over the Government on the issue. This may be a major victory for free software foundation(fsf) which has been lobbying hard against the bill."
Related Stories
[+]
News: The Myth of the New India 378 comments
theodp writes "An NYT op-ed on The Myth of the New India reports that only 1.3M Indians are participating in the so-called new economy of BPO, leaving 400M have-nots without a piece of the pie. Despite recent gains, nearly 380M Indians still live on less $1 a day, setting the stage for rural and urban conflict." From the article: "No labor-intensive manufacturing boom of the kind that powered the economic growth of almost every developed and developing country in the world has yet occurred in India. Unlike China, India still imports more than it exports. This means that as 70 million more people enter the work force in the next five years, most of them without the skills required for the new economy, unemployment and inequality could provoke even more social instability than they have already."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
wow, I guess we'll... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:wow, I guess we'll... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:wow, I guess we'll... (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, but it'll be patented in the USA, so posts like the trol^Wgrandparent won't be going away for a while.
Unless, of course, you're posting from India.
Soko
Parent
Not only the FSF (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Not only the FSF (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Not only the FSF (Score:4, Insightful)
Do Indian companies really invest in patents on a scale similar to American or European companies? I doubt it. By eliminating software patents, India paves the way to preventing foreign companies from exploiting their software-related patents.
And open source software can be better rooted and supported in India. Why give the money to foreign companies for large volumes of license fees when you can be paying your own people to implement solutions that already exist. Short of an Indian company developing an operating systems, open source software is the best choice for keeping software-related expenditure within the Indian economy.
Parent
Above is a Troll posting AC (Score:5, Informative)
It only shows he knows nothing of the Indian President. Here are some facts so people can see for themselves:
Some of his speeches [indianembassy.org]
A description of a personal encounter [tcs.co.in]
His own website describing his aspirations [abdulkalam.com]
A few of his accomplishments [indiainfo.com]
Finally, for those REALLY interested, here's his auto-biography [amazon.com]
Parent
Re:Above is a Troll posting AC (Score:5, Interesting)
The ORBIS flying eye hospital came to Delhi a few weeks ago and he dropped in to see it (here's a picture of him on the plane [ecind.com]). He did the required politcal duty as required. But he also asked intelligent questions about the set-up and figured out there was a bottleneck in comms (the aim of the flying eye hospital is to spread knowledge about eye treatments, but they could only arrange for local broadcast of the videos of the surgeries). The President said he'd try and do something about it.
Shortly afterwards - blam! - we had a satelite uplink so that the surgery teaching sessions were broadcast via satelite to hospitals all over India.
Just think about it - Kalam could have done nothing and no-one would have begrudged him it. But he actually went beyond the polite chit chat, did some figuring out, and then went out his way to actually ease things in a way which make most political leaders seem like whiny midgets. No wonder he is one of the most-loved people in India, and no wonder people think he honours the office of president, rather than the other way round.
Parent
More jobs to go (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:More jobs to go (Score:5, Informative)
An Indian company can apply for software patents in America which will be valid in America, just like anyone else. Those patents won't be valid in India regardless of where you company is based.
Parent
Re:More jobs to go (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Attention U.S. Citizens! (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks,
The Government
Re:Attention U.S. Citizens! (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:Attention U.S. Citizens! (Score:5, Interesting)
What India has over the United States is that they not only have our technical jobs but they also have no legal restrictions on taking any technology learned during that "cultural" exchange.
Technology is what keeps a superpower on top. The Masons knew it, that is why they exist(ed). (Technological) Secrets make a nation thrive and the fact that the United States and Europe will restrict software developers with draconian laws makes our chances nill. If we continue to lead the way in innovations they will be copied at will overseas making *only* our citizens the ones to pay the price for intellectual property. Where will that leave us?
Our patents won't mean a thing when India and China make up most of the computer/internet users and developers. I'm afraid that we will be trying to play fair while others won't - reminds me of the game show "Friend or Foe", everyone must agree or everyone loses. I'm drunk, but look more into China and Russia's copying of CDMA technology to learn more about how we can lose...
Parent
Actually I would say it is Education (Score:4, Insightful)
This should be even more important to the US, as with our smaller population we have a smaller total pool of potential talent, so it should be even more important that we make sure every American has a chance (and is encouraged) to maximize their talents.
We're not doing enough in this area any more, the public looks at Higher Ed. more as a way for an individual to make money than as a public good, so public funding of education has been drying up. If we want to keep our 'place' we'll need to start seeing education as a public good again, and get back to funding it that way...
Parent
Re:Actually I would say it is Education (Score:5, Interesting)
Public education in America was never intended to be for the 'public good'. It has always been intended to provide an educated labor pool.It has always been intended to maintain the status quo and socialize children's behavior to insure a stable work force. They don't teach you to think in public schools - they teach you to behave and accept their version of reality. Which I guess now is that evolution is a theory with about the same chance of validity as devine creation. They even have stickers in the textbooks for proof. There is a reason school teachers and policeman are so low on the pay scale. You get what you pay for.
billy - who worked hard to slip through the cracks
Parent
I want to move! (Score:3, Interesting)
I want to move to India! I love Indian food and culture already, and now they get to be free of software patents! Not fair.
When will governments in the western world start doing what the people want, and not what only the rich and powerful want!
Seems like a smart move. (Score:5, Insightful)
They have nothing to gain from adopting software patents.
Re:Seems like a smart move. (Score:5, Insightful)
Growing yes, innovating hardly. Little innovation means you dont actually have a lot to protect making patents a moot point anyway.
Parent
Re:Seems like a smart move. (Score:5, Insightful)
Isn't one of the arguments against software patents that most of the software patents aren't innovations at all, but mere logical steps forward? So, whose to say they aren't 'innovating' according to the US software patent system?
Parent
Re:Seems like a smart move. (Score:5, Insightful)
So yup, the point is that most countries loosen up IPR protection in order to encourage innovation.
Parent
Re:Seems like a smart move. (Score:5, Interesting)
For now. They don't have to innovate to be successful at this point, because business is flowing in. That will stop as the standard of living in India raises accordingly. When this happens, you'll have lots of smart, capable programmers who know how things are done, and will be able to build upon others' ideas to make new ones. I don't think the cultural differences people often cite are significant enough to stop smart people from doing great things.
Of course, the companies that start to innovate will be the ones with a lot of money in the first place, and if my grasp of political theory serves me well, those companies will have bought legislators by then to get the software patents they'll want to restrict competition. Ain't democracy grand? I hope they prove me wrong.
Parent
Re:Seems like a smart move. (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, I don't think most current innovation is in India _yet_. However this kind of move will certainly help India since they will be free to develop software without having to have to worry about lawsuits.
The ironic thing about software patents is that while their proponents suggest they will help foster innovation, in fact they have the opposite effect and end up only helping to employ IP lawyers instead of engineers.
Parent
So most US innovation is in the past? (Score:5, Insightful)
>> They have nothing to gain from adopting software patents.
Your "smart move" response offers the defence of smartness to both sides --- smart of India to bar software patents because they have nothing to gain, and smartness by the US to uphold software patents because they do have something to gain.
Unfortunately the last part of that is only true under the extraordinarily myopic worldview that most innnovations are in the past, and that therefore it is worth protecting the greater old at the expense of harming the lesser new.
Well that's stunningly short-sighted. The future is pretty much infinite, whereas technological progress of the patentable type has been around for a couple of centuries at most, and software patents even less, so the inventions of the past represent effectively zero percent of the body of technical development.
There could hardly be a greater condemnation of the inability of the supporters of patents to see beyond the ends of their noses.
Parent
For once they got it right (Score:4, Insightful)
As much as I hate these left parties (they're real dumbasses), for once they have done the right thing here.
Left parties doing something actually GOOD for economy. Who knew...
Uh-Oh (Score:5, Insightful)
Couple that with healty dose of the encouragement of innovation, and we just took one right on the chin.
Re:Uh-Oh (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Uh-Oh (Score:5, Insightful)
That's not the way to level the playing field.
That's the way to maintain the status quo and protect only American interests.
The fact is that in the compusing world the real competition is not in thinking up ideas. Ideas are ten a penny. The real competition is on _implementing_ them well. It's the implementers who need protecting from the patent wielding idea merchants who couldn't make great in a million years.
If India becomes better at implementing current ideas on software than America (or anywhere else for that matter) then they _should_ take away business from the other places. That's how free markets work and its all a good thing in the long term.[1]
Once the world realises that by and large, software business works better when it is about services and not products or ideas then things will all even out fairly in time. The likes of Microsoft will either reinvent themselves or die and SMEs will rule the software world. Innovation will flourish, occuring largley collaberatively much as happens now to some extent with FLOSS and other online thinking shops.
[1] factors such as foriegn working condition, minimum wages and various ethical concerns should be considered but are outside the scope of what I was saying.
Parent
Re:Uh-Oh (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Economic impact of this? (Score:5, Interesting)
e.g. could a company over there build a search engine using Google's patented page rank algorithm with out having to pay an licensing fee?
If so, it would seem that India would be an ideal place for most such companies, as they can operate over there with out fear of patent litigation. Also, hopefully something like this would put pressure on the US to reform our current system in order for local companies to be more competitive.
Re:Economic impact of this? (Score:3, Informative)
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1
Re:Economic impact of this? (Score:5, Informative)
On the other hand, Copyright Laws are international and know no bounds (but the chinese borders maybe), and they apply fully to software creation (copyright is what backs the GPL-like licenses).
The very point is that software patents aren't needed and are unnecessary, because not only they'd be redundant if they were always used well, but they're dangerous (for innovation, what they're supposed to protect mind you) when misused.
Parent
Re:Economic impact of this? (Score:5, Informative)
Google hasn't just patented their page rank algorithm. They've patented the idea of giving weight to the links that point to a page. (The competitors seem to be infringing that claim, probably because they are confident that the claim would be tossed by a court, but who knows?).
We could probably live with patents that protect precisely what the inventor invented, but no patent lawyer would settle for that. Instead, the claims generalize to the point of trying to block any conceivable competition, even with wholly new algorithms.
Parent
The situation in India is... (Score:5, Informative)
The government was required by the WTO to adopt a new patent regime in the pharmaceutical sector. There was plenty of opposition to this, mainly from the left, though leaving the WTO is simply not an option and everyone realises that.
So what the government does is have a temporary ordinance, not ratified by the parliament, that's somewhat more draconian that it needs to be. I think the software patents thing was one of those items that the government was always willing to chop. There were also lots of safeguards in the pharma sector itself (regarding making of generic drugs in the national interest), allowed by the WTO, that the government omitted from the ordinance. Even the New York Times had a strong editorial criticising the Indian Government for its unnecessarily restrictive ordinance.
When the time comes to pass it through parliament, voila, the government "accommodates" the left parties by introducing these safeguards and removing things like software patents. The left, in return, supports the bill. And everyone's happy.
Are Patent's Good? (Score:5, Insightful)
The irony is: they were designed to protect the small guy from the big guy. That's right. I shall repeat. They were designed to protect the small guy from the big guy.
They did this to encourage innovation.
You see, some guy in his garage could invent the television, a big company could come along and copy it, and make billions because he has a bigger operating budget. With patents, the guy could protect his invention, and the big guys couldn't steal his idea. All of a sudden, people want to invent because they can protect their ideas.
But now the patent system has turned on its head. It essentially protects the big guys from the small guys. Probably if we looked at patents in their stricted sense, a kid in their garage could write a text editor and infringe on hundreds of patents. I realize this doesn't usually result in a lawsuit, but the system is so convoluted that the only way to understand it is to hire expensive lawyers, which small guys tend not to be able to afford. So in many cases, the small guy gives up when faced with serious opposition (think RIAA).
Okay, I will freely admit that this post is a little inflamatory and that usually lawsuits are not launched even when a patent is owned for things like using key-combinations on a keyboard. But that's not the point.
The point is this: The patent system no longer does what it was supposed to do which is encourage the creation of new ideas. If a system no longer does what it was designed to do, THAT is the definition of broken.
What RMS says (Score:5, Informative)
Richard Stallman had explained this very nicely in a speech against software patents:
In other words, software patents today mostly protect big companies, so it's no surprise that they are the ones who support them the most.
The transcript of the speech can be found here [gnu.org]. Despite the odd transcription error, it's a great read.
Parent
Re:Are Patent's Good? (Score:4, Insightful)
And what *could* stop the "Microsofts" from stealing Rajiv's brilliant idea would be copyright.
Parent
Fantastic! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Fantastic! (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Fantastic! (Score:5, Insightful)
This sounds like pure bullying. Ericsson has NOTHING to gain in the area of protecting their software by moving to the US or Japan. You have to apply for patents in countries where you wish to RELEASE your product, not where you DEVELOP your products. So if Ericsson wishes to release products in both the US and Sweden, they have to apply for patents in both places, whether they have their factory located in the US or in Sweden. Actually, they run a higher risk in the US, because in the US a competitor might attempt to close them down because they are (alledgedly) infringing on one of the competitor's patents, while, without software patents in Sweden, in Sweden they wouldn't run any risk at all. That is aside the fact that rebuilding a factory and rehiring personnel in a very expensive country like the US would probably not be profitable. So, methinks this is a lot of hot air from Ericsson.
Parent
This is why competition is a good thing (Score:5, Insightful)
I think there are a lot of people who for one reason or another think that competition from other countries is a bad thing.
They seem to think that it is somehow 'unfair' that people in other contries can make product X cheaper. I don't know how many times I've heard the 'rush to the bottom' argument from people who obviously have no grasp of basic economics.
If you are one of those people please read this:
http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/pdg.pl?fcd=dsp&ter
The reason competition is good in this particular case is because the US government is clearly not acting in its citizens best interest in regards to software patents.
The contries that have a more rational intelectual property policy will obviously benefit. This will do one of two things:
1. Businesses and citizens who create software will be forced to move to these 'enlightened' contries if they aren't there already. Basically the US will find itself locking itself out of the software market because producing software in the US will become too expensive or in some instances maybe even impossible.
2. Because of pressure from 1. the US will be forced to adopt better laws.
Basically if you can squash competition by making everyone obey your rules then you can force through productivity and creativity limiting laws such as software patents.
However in a free marketplace countries that have chosen not to incorporate such laws will naturally do better than countries that have. I'm assuming here of course that software patents stifle creativity and productivity but I think this is a pretty safe assumtption.
If you don't understand why software patents are bad please read this:
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/intro/index
In short this is good for everyone because it will garantee that consumers of software will continue to benefit from the explosion of creativity and productivity in the software industry. Also for those of us who produce software this helps by putting real pressure on our government to change its tune in regards to software patents.
Re:This is why competition is a good thing (Score:4, Insightful)
2. Because of pressure from 1. the US will be forced to adopt better laws.
OR,
2a. Because of pressure from 1. the US will push software patents through WTO.
Now, which one looks more likely?
Parent
They will be back :( (Score:5, Informative)
In short, it wasn't because the government was convinced that swpats were bad, but because they found that the remaining stuff that they needed to push through was more important to them.
Sadly, despite all the good press, the mentality remains unchanged, and I am certain there will be more attempts very soon.
Re:Mplayer should migrate to India (Score:5, Interesting)
Do not mistake the terms in EULAs for laws. Copyright does not grant the content provider the right to the restrictions they require in EULAs, that is why they need you to sign them over in a contract. For it to be a legal contract they must give you something of value in turn (purchasing gave you the right to use the material however you please without a contract), Microsoft gives you $5 worth of data loss protection IF you can successfully sue them for it. Aren't they swell?
Parent
Re:Not Good for Indian companies (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Rejecting patents is not a real solution.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:But how long will it last? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Of course they did... (Score:5, Insightful)
There isn't one, and trying to make one up won't work. The reason for outsourcing is to drive down labour costs, not to escape software patents.
Parent
Re:Idiot (Score:5, Insightful)
You aren't arguing for making money in the free market, you're arguing for a government granting you a monopoly so there is no free market.
Parent
Re:Excellent Chairman Mao^c^c^c Smithers (Score:4, Interesting)
So I guess you wouldn't even consider the possibility that our various IP laws themselves are hampering our ability to compete?
Parent