Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Where Do Dummy Email Addresses Go?

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sun Jul 11, 2004 09:52 AM
from the but-what-does-it-mean-man dept.
ajain writes "Maybe a year and a half back or so, I started using someone@somewhere.com as a dummy email id in online blogs, guestboks, forums, and sundry pages. But then I started wondering what if someone actually tried to email me on that email address. I was sure that it would bounce because I assumed that there wouldn't be an actual email address like that. In any case, just for fun, I decided to google on someone@somewhere.com. And lo behold, there are some 4090 results! I have written a small article at my blog and a reader says NoOne@NoWhere.com is another contender. Do you use some common dummy email IDs too, to get around the privacy problem online? Isn't there a potential for malicious misuse of someone's email ID in this way?"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Lord Bitman (95493) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:53AM (#9666195) Homepage
    how many people fill out bill.g@microsoft.com (or something similar)
    the answer is "yes", move along.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:02AM (#9666288)
      I have been using sjobs@apple.com for years.
      • by SatanicPuppy (611928) <Satanicpuppy@@@gmail...com> on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:46AM (#9667029) Journal
        My personal favorite is Bob@aol.com, mainly because it's so short. I pity the poor bastard who got that email address though...It seems like, with AOL, that address is bound to be in use.
            • Re:isn't it obvious? (Score:5, Informative)

              by SiChemist (575005) on Sunday July 11 2004, @03:26PM (#9668648) Homepage
              In RFC 2606, example.com, example.net and example.org are reserved for testing. Therefore, I always use [somename]@example.com for my fake e-mail needs.

              There's some good info here:

              http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/4051 [oreillynet.com]

              and here:

              http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2606.html [faqs.org]
              • by pyrrhonist (701154) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:11PM (#9670982)
                There isn't a no.com, so no one is getting my spam.

                When we find you, we will KICK YOUR ASS!!!!!

                Sincerely,

                Registrant:
                CentralNic Ltd (NO202-DOM)
                64-66 Coleman Street
                London EC2R 5BX
                UK

                Domain Name: NO.COM

                Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
                Department, Technical (23456529I) hostmaster@centralnic.net
                CentralNic Ltd
                64-66 Coleman Street
                London EC2R 5BX
                UK
                +44.2073843050 fax: +44.2077369253

                Record expires on 26-Oct-2010.
                Record created on 20-May-1997.
                Bulk whois optout: Y
                Database last updated on 11-Jul-2004 22:01:09 EDT.

                Domain servers in listed order:

                NS0.CENTRALNIC.NET 213.146.149.169
                NS1.CENTRALNIC.NET 213.146.149.134
                LON-NS-2.CENTRALNIC.NET 195.149.39.141
    • by yobbo (324595) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:30AM (#9666485)
      Actually, my dummy email has always been support@microsoft.com .
      • by Cylix (55374) on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:17AM (#9666844) Homepage Journal
        I've been using spam@aol.com for years.

        I hope AOL appreciates my efforts ;)
      • by cjellibebi (645568) on Sunday July 11 2004, @06:02PM (#9669857)
        > Actually, my dummy email has always been support@microsoft.com .

        Oh dear... I can see this already.



        Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 555666

        Are we satisfied with the length of our penis?

        Symptoms: You are unsure if we at Microsoft Support are satisfied with the length of our collective penis.

        Resolution: To solve the problem:

        1. Repeat the following mantra to yourself over and over again: "Microsoft Support is satisfied with the length of it's penis. Everyone is satisfied with the length of their penises. If I don't stop asking people these questions, my own penis will shrivel up and fall off."...
        2. Fuck off.

        Status: Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the internet e-mail system, which thanks to our insecure e-mail apps and OSses, has gotten a lot worse than it should. Also, stupid users are to blame.

        The information in this article applies to: Yourself you good for nothing spammer, Clippy.

    • Network Solutions (Score:5, Insightful)

      by TheLink (130905) on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:01AM (#9666728) Journal
      Maybe an address at networksolutions.com or netsol.com would be more appropriate, after all they want to be the destination for traffic to nonexistent domain names with their sitefinder crap.

      • Nonexistent domains (Score:5, Interesting)

        by blorg (726186) on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:53AM (#9667064)
        Heh. I actually registered that [nonexistentdomain.com] to put up a parody/protest about sitefinder. The domain turns out to get a lot of spam; some stuff from people who obviously just typed it into a form, but also however from people who had their mail systems configured to divert their spam/bad mail to nonexistentuser@nonexistentdomain.com (or some variant). All were happy to stop when asked, but if you must configure your mail like this, possibly better use an *impossible* domain (I did get a fair bit of private email bounced on to me by badly configured mail systems).
        • by Waltre (523056) <shane,handley&gmail,com> on Sunday July 11 2004, @12:44PM (#9667410) Homepage

          hmmmm...all this bandwidth being wasted.

          I feel it's my duty to the internet to point these clowns to h4wh4w@127.0.0.1.

          You'd be suprised how many sites will actually allow this, since the regular expressions that check them usually allow for identifier@sub.dns.com.country, with each allowing [a-zA-Z0-9].

      • by TubeSteak (669689) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:54AM (#9666677) Journal
        I'm surprised no one has started this earlier

        someone@somewhere.com VS none@none.com [googlefight.com]
        4090 to 6660
        Round 1 goes to None@None.com

          • by WuphonsReach (684551) on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:41AM (#9667003)
            If I'm posting to UseNet, I usually make up some alias to stick in front of @nowhere.com.

            I sorta pity whoever owns @nowhere.com

            (Actually, there is someone who owns @NoWhere.com, registered back in 1994 according to WhoIs. However, there are no NS, MX or SOA records so e-mail to that domain goes nowhere.)
            • by alphaseven (540122) on Sunday July 11 2004, @01:44PM (#9667811)
              Yeah there used to be a page up for nowhere.com, where they would complain about their old IPX receiving about 80'000 emails a month. You can see the old page at archive.org.

              http://web.archive.org/web/*/nowhere.com

        • Re:isn't it obvious? (Score:5, Informative)

          by operagost (62405) on Sunday July 11 2004, @01:02PM (#9667517) Homepage Journal
          No, example.com is valid (or invalid, as it were). Review RFC 2606 [rfc-editor.org].
          • by billstewart (78916) on Sunday July 11 2004, @03:03PM (#9668432) Journal
            A couple of years ago, example.com handling changed - it now exists to give you warning messages. In the past, the name was reserved by IANA, and listed in whois as being reserved, but it didn't resolve to an IP address. There's now an IP address (192.0.34.166), which resolves as example.com and www.example.com, and it doesn't have an SMTP server, but does have a web server [example.com] which tells you
            You have reached this web page by typing "example.com", "example.net", or "example.org" into your web browser.

            These domain names are reserved for use in documentation and are not available for registration. See RFC 2606, Section 3.
  • asdf (Score:5, Informative)

    by fishrokka (233163) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:55AM (#9666210)
    I always use asdf@asdf.com

    seems I'm not alone:

    http://www.asdf.com/asdfemail.html [asdf.com]

    http://www.asdf.com/whatisasdf.html [asdf.com]

  • Mail Somewhere (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mfh (56) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:55AM (#9666211) Journal
    Strangely enough, somewhere.com [somewhere.com] offers anti-spam services as well as other consulting things. Could it be that they have set up someone@somewhere.com as a black hole to track spammers? That sure would rock. There is always some misuse when you post your email address online. Don't do it. Simply code a form for contacting you via email and let PHP or whatever send it to you behind the scenes. This halts any kind of email harvesting, and results in the use of faked email addresses, or obvious ones, like admin@DOMAIN.com or whatever. If you have a catchall, you should disable it and let them all bounce. When enough email bounces, someone somewhere will figure out something to solve the problem of spam, or run of the mill spammers will just give up.
    • Oh, The Irony... (Score:5, Informative)

      by mellon (7048) * on Sunday July 11 2004, @12:56PM (#9667467) Homepage
      Somewhere.com is a domain that was registered by a friend of mine long long ago back before spam and web sites and all that crap ruined the beauty that was the Old Internet. (I'm being ironic here, by the way). I think he registered it because he thought it was kind of funny, but unfortunately he pointed it at his mail server.

      It turns out that as the internet became more and more popular, more and more people started using someone@somewhere.com as the address they'd put into email when they didn't want the originator of the email to be known. For example, forwarded mail where you don't want the person who forwarded it to get mad at you for publishing their email address.

      So he started getting a lot of crank email to somewhere.com - people complaining that he shouldn't send them mail about Jesus' third coming in a UFO, and stuff like that. For a while he tried sending mail to these people to clue them in, but of course they were un-cluable.

      Eventially, it got to the point where he was mostly getting the kind of stuff you get when you've been joe-jobbed - angry replies to actual spam of the kind to which we've sadly become accustomed. It was then that he started analyzing the responses, and I'm pretty sure this is what inspired his anti-spam work.

      Messagefire, the anti-spam service he started, really rocks. It's too bad that they've stopped accepting new customers. Sigh. Because I know him, I got in on the ground floor, and am still using it to filter my spam. It's wildly successful, and I'm very grateful to him for setting it up. I hope at some point they start selling service again. :'}
  • Mailinator (Score:5, Informative)

    by iCharles (242580) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:55AM (#9666226) Homepage
    I used to use the ones you describe, as well as "fatchance@nospam.com." Then, I discovered Mailinator [mailinator.com]. This is pretty handy. You make up an address @mailinator.com. Mail can go there, and the address is "created" on the fly. Later, if you are really interested (say, a registration for a newspaper site), you can pick up the mail. After a few hours, the account is deleted.
  • by Andy_R (114137) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:57AM (#9666241) Homepage Journal
    The domain "example.com" is reserved for exactly this purpose.

    However, I find that for cases where you can be reasonably certain your address is NEVER going to be used for legitimate purposes (such as cases like this where the context implies the address is useless and it will only be treated as real by harvesters), you can skip the middle man by using uce@ftc.gov
    • by tignom (562076) on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:27AM (#9666927)
      uce@ftc.gov is my favorite when someone with no legitimate use for my email is requesting it. If that won't take, next in line are postmaster@site.com, webmaster@site.com and root@site.com - where site.com is whatever site is demanding my email. After that comes abuse@aol.com, abuse@hotmail.com and abuse@earthlink.net. I don't expect AOL or any of the other big ISPs to do anything, but on the off chance they do, it means a site that's trying to abuse my email will run afowl of someone who can cut them off from a large number of customer/victims.
  • by DeadSea (69598) * on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:59AM (#9666252) Homepage Journal
    1. foo@bar.com [google.com] - 15,800
    2. someone@somewhere.com [google.com] - 4,170
    3. nobody@nowhere.com [google.com] - 2,900
    4. root@localhost.localdomainm [google.com] - 2,860
    5. mickey@mouse.com [google.com] - 2,470
    6. somebody@somewhere.com [google.com] - 2,240
    7. john@doe.com [google.com] - 2,120
    8. billgates@microsoft.com [google.com] - 1,790
    9. me@mine.com [google.com] - 1,400
    10. noone@nowhere.com [google.com] - 975
    11. fake@fake.com [google.com] - 710
    12. jane@doe.com [google.com] - 423
  • by Neophytus (642863) * on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:59AM (#9666253)
    There are plenty of places you can safely point to. It's fair to assume that mailboxes at example.{com [example.com]|net [example.net]|org [example.net]} are unmonitored. There's also me@privacy.net which bounces email with a polite notice [privacy.net] that you don't want email from the sender. Spamcop provides the conspicuous nobody@devnull.spamcop.net, originally provided for users of their newsgroups but open to all and of course you can just use fake tlds like nobody@fake.invalid which will always be rejected before the email even leaves the spammer's servers.

    If you do want to recieve email but only, say, once from a company then you'll be looking at SpamGourmet [spamgourmet.com] which provides simple, free, fowarding addresses that expire after X hits.
  • by photonic (584757) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:59AM (#9666256)
    ... i still have to ask a guy named Donald working for Disney and a guy named Dubya working at the whitehouse, if they ever received any mail for me.
  • by YankeeInExile (577704) * on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:00AM (#9666262) Homepage Journal

    Once Upon A Time, a friend of mine had a domain that spelled a major ISPs name backwards (he registered it on purpose, and joked that he was the "anti-big vendor" and gave shell accounts to friends, friends of friends, etc.

    Then, someone started posting to usenet a lot, who was a customer of Big Vendor , and he 'spam-proofed' his address by ever so cleverly spelling it backwards.

    Suddenly dozens if not hundreds of undeliverable messages started landing on Mike's server for some clown over at ReallyBigISP.

    So, like any good sysadmin, he corrected this oversight, adding a sendmail rule to deliver mail for jrluser@psigib.com to jrluser@bigisp.com.

    The moral of the story: Do not create harm for some innocent third party with your spam evasion techniques. It may come back to haunt you.

  • by jjh37997 (456473) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:01AM (#9666273) Homepage
    Untitled Document

    Maybe a year and a half back or so, I started using someone@somewhere.com as a dummy email id in online blogs, guestboks, forums, and sundry pages. But then I started wondering what if someone actually tried to email me on that email address.

    So.... you're the jackass who clogged up my mailbox with all this crap. Thanks alot, pal!

  • by LiamQ (110676) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:02AM (#9666281)
    RFC 2606 [rfc-editor.org] reserves domain names like example.com, so you can safely use those without hitting existing email addresses.
  • Ex boss.. (Score:4, Funny)

    by sporty (27564) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:03AM (#9666292) Homepage
    I usually use the email of an ex-boss that I hate.

  • by magefile (776388) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:03AM (#9666295)
    Use a domain less than 3 chars - can't exist, according to standards, so you won't be abusing anyone. If that's not allowed, use example.com (or .org, or .net), which was set up as a dummy domain to be used in examples.

    The best way I've found, though, is mailinator.com. Every @mailinator.com account "exists" (is created as needed), and other than (perhaps) root, abuse, etc., they aren't passworded. So you don't even have to set up a junk account, just make up the address on the fly. Be sure to delete any emails with passwords in 'em ASAP, of course.
  • Itsnot@real.com (Score:5, Interesting)

    by chrispl (189217) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:14AM (#9666379) Homepage
    One I have used for years. I am sure Mr. Irvin Tsnot at Real Networks [real.com] is wondering why he gets so much junk Email...
  • by Secrity (742221) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:18AM (#9666404)
    The somewhere.com domain is registered by Speakeasy. I checked and found that there is currently no mailserver associated with somewhere.com, so in this case you lucked out and didn't hurt anyone with your misguided efforts. People using random email addresses are very much like people randoming shooting guns. The example.com, example.org, and example.net domains are safe to use for this purpose, see RFC 2606, Section 3.
  • by nurb432 (527695) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:20AM (#9666419) Homepage Journal
    1 - you are falsifying your identity with intent to deceive.

    2 - you are assuming the identity of someone else, again with intent.

    3 - improperly using others resources, or causing harm to others resources..

    Doubt anyone would ever be tried and convicted under the law, but in this day and age, when people are jailed just for speaking, and the government will monitor what books you read, anything is possible..
    • by syukton (256348) on Sunday July 11 2004, @02:38PM (#9668221)
      Funny, I didn't know "email address" was synonymous with "identity."

      When somebody asks for your email address, they're asking for a way to contact you--like a phone number. They're not asking for you to uniquely identify yourself as you would with a driver's license or passport, they're only asking how they can reach you.

      Email is not identity, and using a dummy email address is not illegal.
  • The correct way (Score:4, Informative)

    by nsayer (86181) <nsayer@kfu.TIGERcom minus cat> on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:24AM (#9666443) Homepage
    is to use any LHS @example.com. This, by RFC, is guaranteed to belong to nobody.
  • by nazgul@somewhere.com (188228) on Monday July 12 2004, @12:32AM (#9672063) Homepage
    I registered somewhere.com in 1995 (hey, it was free :-). After I sold my first consulting company, I named the next one after the domain. Somewhere.Com, LLC.

    Spam didn't exist at the time. The first warning signs were when we'd occasionally get email bounces. Some versions of 'mail' on Unix, when unable to figure out who to return a bounce to, would send it to somewhere!name-of-the-user. Sendmail would helpfully turn that into somewhere.com, and we'd get the email.

    When spam started, we started getting bounce backs. Spammers were using it as a "fake" domain. In those days somewhere's mail system was a Mac 8500 on a cable modem. Life would get very interesting when all of AOL's mail servers started throwing bounces at me as fast as they could. I had originally been bouncing messages back with messages asking people to stop--that had to change to straight rejections.

    As a result of the time I was spending handling somewhere's email problems, I got into the anti-spam business. Initially writing tools to track spammers (http://www.spamwatcher.com/ is still up, although I don't know how well the spam analysis stuff is working). Later I co-founded Messagefire, an end-user anti-spam service.

    In the meantime somewhere's email flow continued to climb. It's doubled every year. Hoaxes like the one about "wormalert@somewhere.com" (put it in your address book, and the fact that it's fake will cause viruses to die) didn't help. Nor did Microsoft FrontPage shipping with webmaster@somewhere.com as the default address in its templates. Axis shipped an internet enabled video camera that that (if you turned on the email feature) defaulted to sending all your security pictures to somewhere.com. (They've fixed it, but there are still cameras out there sending us a picture every 5-10 seconds.). Viruses that picked up all the references to somewhere.com off of people's address book and web caches started to account for more than a third of the email. People signing up for things with "fake" addresses accounted for a lot as well. (Why anyone would use an email address at a domain and not check to see if the domain existed first, I have no clue. Neither, apparently, do a lot of people who enter fake email addresses.) By last year we were rejecting 100,000 messages a day, of which close to 40,000 were going to someone@somewhere.com. I upgraded my DSL line to 768k just to handle the flow, and I had to limit my mail server to 100 simultaneous connections at a time.

    This year we sold Messagefire to a Seattle company called MessageGate, and I now work for them. We use somewhere.com to stress test our enterprise anti-spam and compliance software. That happened only just in time; my router was starting to fail frequently under the load. Now the mail's on a high-bandwidth connection with multiple machines to handle the load--I just pick up the legitimate addresses after the spam has been filtered out.

    I haven't looked in on it in several months, but we did let the email run unthrottled once early this year. After a few hours we were looking at enough bandwidth saturate several T1's, and volume of at least one million messages a day.

    A couple things in summary.

    1. Don't use fake email addresses. If you don't trust the site you are giving your email address too, then why are you doing business with them? If you're afraid of spam because you're posting your address publicly; then buy some anti-spam software. If I can manage to use legitimate email accounts on somewhere.com and not worry about spam, then obviously there's some out there that works well. I've been posting on usenet and the web using nazgul@somewhere.com for the past 9 years. The spammers definitely have my address. So what?

    2. If you're going to make up a domain name, then *check* first to see if it's real! Better yet, don't. Just because it's not real now doesn't mean it won't be later. Use example.{com,net,org} if you must.

    3. I see a number of people here s
    • Re:example.com? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by magefile (776388) on Sunday July 11 2004, @09:58AM (#9666248)
      If you go to example.com (or .org, .net) it'll tell you that it was set up as a dummy domain in some RFC for the express purpose of being used as an example: "so then you point your browser to example.com" that wouldn't be abusable. So go right ahead and use example.[com|org|net].
    • by kyknos.org (643709) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:02AM (#9666286) Homepage
      using another person as your dummy adress is pure EVIL. i was forced to abandon my main email adress because some moron used very extensivelly as a dummy address. and it was no coincidence, the address was too complex. before bayesian filtering, i had no other option than change my email and it is not an easy task if you have used for long time, you have printed ona various dead trees and so on
    • Re:fake email (Score:5, Interesting)

      by pegr (46683) * on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:05AM (#9666319) Homepage Journal
      Even better, don't use a fake email. I use me@privacy.net. If you send mail there, you get an auto-reply that says the submitter likes their privacy and you generally suck for being an email harvester. Go ahead, send me@privacy.net an email and see what I mean...

      • Re:fake email (Score:5, Insightful)

        by samhalliday (653858) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:37AM (#9666535) Homepage Journal
        thats the stupidist idea i have ever heard of!

        the From: header can be easily forged and these privacy.net guys are just adding to the misuse of net traffic by replying.

        spam should go to one of 2 places... an authority who can fine the sender, or /dev/null (preferably the mail server will reject the spam before even collecting it, such as grey listing does)

      • Re:fake email (Score:5, Informative)

        by redhat421 (620779) * on Sunday July 11 2004, @11:22AM (#9666885)
        I don't think that me@privacy.net is going to be sending any auto replys.

        $ host -t mx privacy.net
        privacy.net mail is handled by 10 mail.privacy.net.
        $ host mail.privacy.net
        mail.privacy.net has address 127.0.0.1
    • by MikShapi (681808) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:22AM (#9666437) Journal
      Probbably half the /. crowd, myself among them, worked in support, YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!

      Do some good - tell them about darl@sco.com

      And if you can add a sig with HTML, Feel free to throw this little charm in as well:
      <A HREF="http://www.thescogroup.com/">litigious bastards</A>
    • RFC 2606 (Score:5, Informative)

      by HughsOnFirst (174255) on Sunday July 11 2004, @10:26AM (#9666460)
      example.com is set up for exactly thie purpose. See RFC 2606. .test .invalid .localhost are also mentioned in RFC 2606. .localhost may cause more fun when somone tries to mail spam to it.