Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Webcams to Enforce Singapore Quarantine

Posted by CmdrTaco on Thu Apr 10, 2003 03:14 PM
from the now-thats-just-creapy dept.
magarity writes "Singapore has hired a private security firm to install internet connected webcams in homes of persons quarantined for SARS in order to watch them to see if they go out. They are considering adding electronic wristbands as well. 9 of the 490 persons have broken the quarantine despite a fine of 10,000 singapore dollars ($5,621US). Just over 100 people worldwide have died from SARS so far."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • "It was just the cold!"

    Do you dream of the dark man, too?
    • This isn't off topic.. mods on crack. (:

      Captain Tripps is what they called the killer disease in The Stand... and the Dark Man, aka Randall Flagg, is the bad guy in the book.
  • ... and in reality is worn about the neck. It comes with a detonatable charge to sever the individual's neck should they attempt to go further than the 8' extension cord allows. Please hope they find an outlet in the bathroom

    Now, all dilbert joking aside, this is one disease that scares me... without a common vector identified.... we might all be in for it.
    • Now, all dilbert joking aside, this is one disease that scares me... without a common vector identified.... we might all be in for it.

      No kidding. This thing is being reported as the kiss of death. This is the first time I've seen ANYTHING like the following in ANY news report:
      Around two-thirds of people diagnosed with SARS in Singapore have recovered.

      I wish someone would have said that earlier. It's the last line in the linked article, and it almost seems like an afterthought.
      Why is it just l

      • Hell that's not a bad idea as far as I'm concerned. These people are under quarrantine for a reason. I see no problem with shooting them if they refuse to comply. We know that people who have it can spread it. These 9 people are putting the lives of too many at risk.

        You're not sufficiently paranoid. OK, maybe you are, in a sort of Howard Huges microbial way, but if you'll turn your creative anxieties a different direction for a moment -- to the powers of the state -- maybe you'll understand why death pena
      • Yes, but the flu is already beyond containment. Tell me, if we had a reasonable chance of eliminating the flu through a few hundred quarantines for a few weeks, wouldn't you agree it was worth it? What about the common cold? I certainly would think thats a pretty good trade-off.
        • by the Atomic Rabbit (200041) on Thursday April 10 2003, @05:18PM (#5705939)
          And the 4% mortality rate is probably inflated from the true mortality rate given modern medicine: the majority of the deaths occurred in the rural Chinese province from which the bug first emerged.

          Nope. Figures for infection (death) from the latest BBC story on SARS [bbc.co.uk]:

          Hong Kong 970 (27) 2.8%
          Singapore 118 (9) 7.6%
          Canada 91 (10) 11.0%

          These three countries have medical facilities on par with those in the United States. The numbers are too small to arrive at a precise mortality rate, but your hypothesis is clearly wrong.

          • And of those numbers what percentage were immunocompromised in some way (elderly, etc.)? What percentage were impoverished? The BBC's summary counts tell us little about the true mortality rate given medical care and a healthy immune system.

            Frankly I'm not running for my surgical mask just yet.
            -j
  • x10 camera! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Limburgher (523006) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:17PM (#5704880) Homepage Journal
    Mount inside doctors office! Spy on babysitter, kids, neighbors! Stops SARS!

    Failing that, meet in in Boulder. Mother Abigail said that The Dark Man is gathering his own on the other side of the mountains. . .

  • Click here! (Score:4, Funny)

    by dr_dank (472072) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:18PM (#5704890) Homepage Journal
    The hottest sluts with mysterious respiratory diseases are waiting to chat with YOU!
  • Why are we quarantining people over something with a 4% mortality rate? [thanks google]

    We don't put electronic trackers on people with measles. Yet more government knee-jerk reactions....
    • by EnderWiggnz (39214) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:21PM (#5704917)
      hey dickhead - if it truly has a 4% mortality rate, that will kill 1/25 people.

      thats at least one student in a highschool class.

      at least one person in your extended family.

      it does need to be quarantined, or we are all fscked.
      • You're pretty silly to be calling someone else names when you don't understand the statistics of disease.

        What the parent poster hinted at, and you completely missed, is that measles, among a number of other diseases, have higher mortality rates than just 4%.

        Google for it (something the parent poster also mentioned).

      • That's right - Influenza killed 63,730 people in the US in 1999, according to the CDC. Flu has a mortality rate of around 1.5%.

        If you want to make a *very* rough extrapolation of the data, assuming that SARS is about as virulent and becomes as prevelent as influenza, you might expect it to kill *at least* 130,000 people in the US per year. Bear in mind that the widespread use of an influenza vaccine reduces 'flu deaths considerably... we don't yet have a vaccine for SARS.

        That would conservatively put SARS
    • by Bloodshot (8999) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:25PM (#5704963) Homepage
      It's only 4% because people are acting quickly to try and stop it from spreading. I live and work around Toronto (which is one of the places where SARS has shown up with a vengence in Canada), and believe me, it's a big freakin' deal. I had to go the doctor for treatment of strep throat and there was a form I had to fill out about SARS and every medical person there had a filter mask on and wouldn't go NEAR you until they determined you weren't a SARS risk.

      Like some others have said, how would YOU feel if someone you knew was one of those 4%. I think your knee would jerk pretty high.
        • Nobody's saying that doctors should ignore other diseases. They're just saying that SARS is a serious deal, and that we should focus on trying to stop it.

          4% mortality rate may not seem that high, but consider this... how many times have you had a cold in your life? Knowing that SARS is transmitted as easily as the common cold, how does that 4% mortality rate seem now? Think of it this way... there's very little chance that you'd live long enough to have 20 colds.
    • by Waffle Iron (339739) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:28PM (#5705000)
      Why are we quarantining people over something with a 4% mortality rate?

      The 4% mortality rate is before all of the hospitals are full and before the world's supply of available respirators is exhausted. If 1,000,000 people in one country catch this, things could be different.

      I'm just hoping that this virus mellows out a little bit as it goes through multiple generations in humans, as some viruses have been known to do. That might be the only way it will slow down.

    • by kiwimate (458274) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:29PM (#5705019) Journal
      ...in Toronto [www.cbc.ca], causing Ontario public health officials to order 197 people into isolation.

      And, by the way, it's now been discovered to be a relative [yahoo.com] of one of the many viruses that cause the common cold. But that kind of got overshadowed by all the war news.

      As did the anti-war protest database [yahoo.com] being kept by the NYPD. But ignore this, it's off topic.
    • by whm (67844) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:31PM (#5705036)
      Perhaps because Measles has a mortality rate of only about 0.2%? CDC Reference [cdc.gov]. There is also a vaccine for measles (which I'm sure contributes to the mortality rate listed on that page)

      With SARS we're also dealing with something we don't entirely understand yet. I'm personally impressed with how serious it's being treated. If anything, it helps us practice in case of a more significant situation.

      Better safe than sorry, you know?

    • Why are we quarantining people over something with a 4% mortality rate?

      It's too early to state a mortality rate for SARS. Most of the people who have the syndrome were diagnosed much more recently than the first batch of victims, and we don't know how many of the current patients will survive. Simply looking at the number of people who have already died compared to the number of current cases (like some reporters have tried) does not give you reliable statistics in this case.

      Also, the seriousness of a

    • by MightyTribble (126109) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:37PM (#5705097)
      ...which killed upwards of 20 MILLION people, had a mortality rate of 3%.

      SARS seems to be *at least* as transmissible as the 1918 flu was.

      That's why.
        • Huh, the 1918 flu started in China? I wonder why it is often called the "Spanish" flu?

          Google here I come ...

          #4 on the hit chart [essortment.com]-

          The Spanish Flu actually originated in Tibet in 1917. As the armies of various nations moved across the continents the flu spread with them. Before long cases were showing up in Europe. When it hit France, it changed its character, becoming malignant as it was contracted by African soldiers who had been recruited into the French army. After establishing a stronghold in Fr

      • I agree with most of what you say, but I think you are missing something. If the SARS virus came from nature somehow (say from other mammals or, like West Nile, is carried in birds) then eradication is impossible, at least permanently.

        Even having no humans infected at any given time doesn't guarantee it doesn't pop up from time to time (like Ebola).

        The unique thing about smallpox (the example you gave) is that it had no carrier and no host. (Malaria for instance has a carrier; I don't know if it infects o

  • reality TV? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by AbdullahHaydar (147260) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:19PM (#5704903) Homepage
    So, who wants to take bets on how soon people will hack into these government quarantine webcams and then blackmail people to keep their private lives from being publicly displayed?
  • by sco08y (615665) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:20PM (#5704908)
    Before you start on about 1984, this is happening in Singapore, not the US.

    And to head off the inevitable Ashcroft / Patriot Act recriminations, please offer actual *proof* of claims that our civil liberties are being eroded.
    • Don't forget that even though Singapore is wealty, it is still not a democracy.
    • by thelexx (237096) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:42PM (#5705142)
      Since you brought it up and apparently missed yesterday's thread with FIFTEEN HUNDRED FSCKING MESSAGES on why Ashcroft/Patriot are bad, here's my favorite:

      Re:Not A Joke (Score:5, Informative)
      by bricriu (184334) on Wednesday April 09, @03:39PM (#5695030)
      (http://slashdot.org/)
      You can be detained, without being charged, indefinitely, having been investigated under a sealed warrant, an unsigned warrant, or no warrant at all, and then be denied access to a lawyer.

      And that is un-American. Period.

        • by thelexx (237096) on Thursday April 10 2003, @04:16PM (#5705455)
          I'm quite sure it was my favorite because it was concise. Are you quite sure he is not a lawyer? Are you quite sure he has not read the law? And realize that everything the original poster of that message said has already happened to people. No, it isn't widespread. That doesn't make it right.

    • Singapore is to authoritarianism as Sweden is to Socialism. It makes it look very nice and attractive and proves that it's a viable way to run a country. Singapore is Ashcroftism taken to a whole new level. Before you dismiss it, you have to deal with Singapore.

      That being said, there's much to criticize in either example, and of course just because one place gets it right; a) doesn't mean it will work everywhere, and b) doesn't mean you would personally want that offal where you live.

      NB, I am not saying t
  • by weave (48069) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:21PM (#5704918) Journal
    Humans can be so stupid. Sometimes I think maybe evolution shouldn't just wipe us all out and start over again. In a few million years, who'll care that the human race had a forced reboot in the 21st Century?

    Looks like we may get lucky this time -- hopefully. If a real killer virus hits, we're all doomed. :(

  • by ERJ (600451) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:22PM (#5704926)
    The people will be called randomly during the day and asked to turn on the camera to confirm that they are really there. The camera will not always be on. Just an extra precaution to make sure people don't just have someone else answer their phone.
  • This is the story of 490 strangers forced to live in a quarantine block together and find out what happens when people stop being polite and start getting SARS...
  • by GeneralEmergency (240687) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:24PM (#5704954) Journal

    ...then MS's ad campain slogan of "Where Do you Want to Go Today?" must really be stinging right about now.
  • SARS (Score:5, Informative)

    by philovivero (321158) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:24PM (#5704956) Homepage Journal
    For those, like me, who didn't know a whole lot about SARS, someone typed up a real nice Wikipedia entry [wikipedia.org] on SARS, including a nice table of diagnosed cases per country.
  • It's not that BAD (Score:4, Informative)

    by jeeryg_flashaccess (456261) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:24PM (#5704958) Homepage Journal
    A 60 minutes segment yesterday reminded views that SARS is far less dangerous than Malaria.

    Malaria kills almost 1 million world wide per year.

    It is also important to mention that SARS could just be a wake up call, one which prods the public to pursue these deadly diseases. If anything, SARS will establish guidelines to prevent future disease outbreaks.

    http://www.cbsnews. com/stories/1998/08/01/48hours/main22761.shtml
    • by robbo (4388) <slashdot&simra,net> on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:41PM (#5705139) Homepage
      Yes, it is that bad. Malaria isn't contagious. If SARS isn't contained, then a lot more than a million people could die. Consider what could happen if SARS spread to Africa, where a significant percentage of the population is infected with an immune-suppressing virus (HIV).
    • Malaria requires a mosquito vector to spread. SARS does not. A CDC official recently said that SARS wasn't [soon] contained, everybody on earth will get it. Nobody is likely to have natural immunity because is it is a recombinant or (less likely) mutation of a coronavirus - thus a new organism.

      If it has an animal host, we are screwed. We either all get it, or we get immunization.

      If not, it may be able to cause it to burn out through quarantine and other infection control measures.

      One thing not shown in t
  • by jetkust (596906) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:28PM (#5705009)
    Law enforcement agencies all over America are in the process of laying off 85% of their police force in favor of 100 strategically placed web cams across the United States.
  • by Helpadingoatemybaby (629248) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:30PM (#5705025)
    SARS isn't the threat that we have to worry about. If it's true that Beijing has been concealing cases of this disease (and in one case supposedly driving a person into Hong Kong to die there) then with the growing density of population we'll see more of these cases from all over.

    This would mean, for example, that in a few years we may have airborne varient strains of other viruses. Now, should an airborne strain of some slow infection cycle be created (like HIV/AIDS, or a pneumonia with a very slow cycle), then most of the world will be infected before the first casualty occurs. Obviously this is fatal situation for mankind. It's not the quick diseases like ebola that we have to fear, it's the slow ones.

    Hope it doesn't happen, but with population densities growing I expect that it will.

    Comments?

  • Forced Confinement (Score:4, Interesting)

    by csguy314 (559705) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:32PM (#5705042) Homepage
    That's what they're doing here in Toronto. People that are refusing to obey the voluntary isolation are being forcibly confined. Some are also being changed by police.
    In fact one school and an office (HP in markham) have been closed because people refused to obey the voluntary isolation.
    I even have family that works in one of the hospitals downtown. There's a lot of FUD about SARS on the news, but I'm not worried. I don't know anyone who's sick and while there are a few new cases being announced, the spread isn't rapid. So I'll just keep reading /. uhh, I mean working.
    • Come on, this isn't a Big Brother issue. These people could be isolated in a high security quaratine wing of a hospital or they could be self-quarantined at home, which is a much better option for the patients concerned, emotionally and psychologically. As someone who's had to have life-saving surgery, I can tell you that recovering at home in familiar surroundings and with all the comforts of your own home (your own bed, TV, PlayStation, PC, internet access, books, etc) is far more preferable than recoveri
      • I read the full article about how the Chinese government in Singapore is violating people's right to privacy by placing a webcam in people's homes.

        China != Singapore. Singapore is an independant state with its own (authoritarian) government. A majority of Singaporeans are ethnically Chinese, but there are also large Malay and Indian ethnic groups.
      • FYI (Score:5, Informative)

        by Uber Banker (655221) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:45PM (#5705175)
        Singapore does not have a Chinese government. SIngapore is a seperate country.

        Your opinions are severly prejudice.

        Singapore is a western country, with a high GDP, a less corrupt government than the US (read corporate influence). The racial mix of SG is Malay, Chinese and others, christian, muslim and buddhist in strong numbers. There is no clear majority [do all people with 'slitty eyes' look the same to you?].

        Take Hawaii for example, a mix of Pacific Islanders, Japanese, Chinese White and African Americans - would you like to call that an East Asian country full of people "_NOT_ like us"???

        Your numbered points are laughable - take point 2 for some crass idiocy "most Taiwanese want Tibet to be in one China" - Taiwanese believe China is an occupied country and Taiwan should take control of it!!! Totally opposite!

        I hope you are as unsuccessful as you are stupid, you surely deserve it.

    • by nochops (522181) on Thursday April 10 2003, @03:53PM (#5705257)
      Evidently this is not your quote, but I wonder if the author has ever been to Singapore. It's one of the cleanest countries in the world. I know, I've been there, and many other SE Asian countries.

      Put it this way, they're so concerned about keeping the city clean, that even chewing gum is banned.
    • by Noofus (114264) <noofusNO@SPAMmac.com> on Thursday April 10 2003, @04:06PM (#5705370) Homepage
      Part of the problem is out over-reliance on anti-bacterial soaps|sponges|cuttingboard|etc.

      The more we 'sanitize' our society the more susceptible we all are when a big bad bug comes along. Personally, I keep myself clean and all, but I will not use anti-bacterial products, with the excpetions of neosporin when I cut myself. The minute amounts of bactieria, firuses, molds, etc that I probably ingest build my immune system.

      Its not a statistically good sampling, but of my friends that are anti-bacterial everything, and my friends that are more like me. The ones that dont use anti-bacterial products tend to get sick less often, and are sick for shorter durations than the people I know that are nuts about anti-bacterial products.

      So I think we need to watch out for these sanitary guidelines - too much is a bad thing.