Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

The Web's Longest Disclaimer

Posted by timothy on Mon Nov 04, 2002 03:52 AM
from the that's-gotta-be-a-joke dept.
An anonymous reader writes "American Airlines are nominated for the 'longest website enduser agreement' category with customers requiring to accept this mammoth 'I accept' dialog before using their site. The tale of the tape includes: 181 paragraphs; 3482 words; and 22411 characters. However even mentioning this is probably in violation of the text."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

    by RinkSpringer (518787) <rinkNO@SPAMrink.nu> on Monday November 04 2002, @03:54AM (#4592994) Homepage Journal
    ...and even a printable version, in case my toilet runs out of paper ... now *that* is service!
  • by e8johan (605347) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:54AM (#4592995) Homepage Journal
    This is probably a way of hiding 'offensive' paragraphs. I'd say that most end-user agreements are too long. A solution to this would be a legal phrasing and a readable phrasing (i.e. a shorter, readable form with the main points).
    • Right, but then, of course, who's to say what the important parts are? The company likely wants certain things hidden. They will certainly tell the lawyers what is "important" and what is "not."

      I mean, the company may consider it important to let you know that you're forbidden to sell their content. However, they may consider it an unimportant footnote that by entering you grant them power of attorney.
    • by Patik (584959) <cpatik@[ ]il.com ['gma' in gap]> on Monday November 04 2002, @04:03AM (#4593048) Homepage Journal
      A solution to this would be a legal phrasing and a readable phrasing (i.e. a shorter, readable form with the main points).
      Then you'll run into all sorts of legal problems. Who decides what is necessary to tell the user, and what he needs to know? A user may read the paraphrased EULA, then perform an action with the software not specifically outlined in that paraphrased form, while the action is clearly described as illegal in the full legalese EULA version.

      Even worse, malicious companies can abuse paraphrasing to hide important information. For example, the shortened EULA for Kazaa (etc) can tell the user what can be done with the software (share and download "files"), but conveniently leave out the legal issues ("files" means only non-copyrighted material). You'll either end up with a bunch of innocent people in trouble with RIAA, or a mess of lawsuits between Kazaa and RIAA because they trick users into clicking "I agree" to an over-simplified statement without explaining the laws in full to the user.

    • by EraseEraseMe (167638) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:06AM (#4593054)
      Hiding the meat and potatoes of a legal argument behind a layer of fluff and doublespeak is incredibly common. In a "CYA" society, you've got to expect that they're going to say everything and anything they can to protect themselves from any sort of liability. What they don't realize however, is that these agreements probably wouldn't stand up under any light.

      For example, one clause "By using the Site, you represent and warrant that you are 18 years of age or older and possess the legal right and ability to enter into this Agreement and to use the Site in accordance with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement" could cause more than a number of problems. Say someone under the age of 18 purchases a ticket from them online...now what? are they legally obligated to actually provide a service to this person, even though said customer is technically not allowed to use the site?

      The rest of the agreement seems to be pretty standard web-related agreements. Agreeing not to upload/download files (1) to a national or resident of or into any country the U.S. has embargoed, including without limitation, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria, or Yugoslavia; (2) to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department's Specially Designated Nationals list, or (3) to anyone on the U.S. Commerce Department's Table of Denial Orders.

      And then at the end of it all, there's the biggest CYA: You may not: S. Engage in any other conduct that is, or that American Airlines deems to be, in conflict with this Agreement.

      Moreover, then there's the liability agreement for the agreement at the end:

      American Airlines may alter, change or improve the Content at any time and without notice.

      Then their privacy policy regarding information they take from you. Although this is a bit of a mind-puzzler:

      American Airlines will not treat as confidential any communications you send to us by electronic mail or otherwise. American Airlines has no obligation to refrain from publishing, reproducing, or otherwise using your communications in any way and for any purpose.

      First company I've seen doing that...Wonder why.

      And then, the final straw: You agree that Texas law governs this Agreement's interpretation and/or any dispute arising from your access to, dealings with, or use of the Site, without regard to conflicts of law principles.

      Ouch.

      The last paragraph, however, is the greatest laugh-inducer:

      If any provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, then the invalid or unenforceable provision will be stricken from this Agreement without affecting the validity or enforceability of any other provision.

      So, they could essentially put "You must name your first child after American Airlines", have it be struck down as idiotic, but the rest of the agreement still stands...nice :)

      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 04 2002, @05:04AM (#4593196)
        "The last paragraph, however, is the greatest laugh-inducer:

        If any provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, then the invalid or unenforceable provision will be stricken from this Agreement without affecting the validity or enforceability of any other provision.

        So, they could essentially put "You must name your first child after American Airlines", have it be struck down as idiotic, but the rest of the agreement still stands...nice :)"

        You must get a lot of laughs then, because I've seen that clause in a LOT of online and offline agreements. Basically if the law says a particular clause doesn't hold up in court the rest isn't invalid. IANAL of course so I can't say how legal that position is.
    • by Eivind (15695) <eivindorama@gmail.com> on Monday November 04 2002, @04:39AM (#4593147) Homepage
      Certainly. But in such an "agreement" all the phrasing is 100% in their favour. The entire thing only says they have all rigths, you have none whatsoever.

      Let's look at a few examples:

      Engage in any other conduct that is, or that American Airlines deems to be, in conflict with this Agreement.

      Now this one is the killer. Notice the OR in there. This one simply says that any conduct which they dislike is in violation of the agreement, whether such conduct is prohibited by the agreement itself or not. In effect this single statement renders the rest of the text meaningless.

      American Airlines specifically denies you permission to hyperlink or provide references to the Site, unless you are allowed to do so under a separate written agreement with American Airlines.

      Nonsense ! By putting up a website they implicitly allow linking to it. If they don't want people to link to it, they can take it down. "Provide reference" is even more ridiculous. Does this mean it's forbidden for me to tell anyone where to find the site ? If not, what does it mean ?

      American Airlines will not treat as confidential any communications you send to us by electronic mail or otherwise. American Airlines has no obligation to refrain from publishing, reproducing, or otherwise using your communications in any way and for any purpose. Again nonsense. They assert that simply by accessing their website, I have to consent to their "agreement". What stops me from sending them "communications" with a similar assertment in it ?

      You understand that American Airlines owns any and all information or material that you post on a Forum. You agree that you waive all of the rights you have to any information or material that you post on a Forum. American Airlines has the right to do whatever it wishes with that information or material, including but not limited to deleting or editing for any reason any posting by you.

      So they own everything, yet in the next paragraph they say that whatever you post to the site is fully your responsibility and they have no obligations whatsoever. Now, which will it be ? Is it *their* material or *my* material ?

      You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless American Airlines and its affiliates from and against any and all claims, demands, proceedings, suits and actions, including any related liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, deficiencies, penalties, taxes, levies, fines, judgments, settlements, expenses (including legal and accountants' fees and disbursements) and costs (collectively, "Claims"), based on, arising out of or resulting from your use of the Site,

      This says that (among other things) if you buy a ticket on the site, and they make a profit, leading to the need to pay taxes, you need to pay those taxes for them. Really. Read it again !

      It goes on, but I think further commenting is needless, the "agreement" is clearly bunk, and I'd like to believe it'd never be upheld in any court in the world. Possible exception for the USA, I recommend people unlucky enough to live there to seek asylum elsewhere.

      • by Jon Peterson (1443) <(gro.tfirdwons) (ta) (noj)> on Monday November 04 2002, @05:38AM (#4593250) Homepage
        You said:

        You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless American Airlines and its affiliates from and against any and all claims, demands, proceedings, suits and actions, including any related liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, deficiencies, penalties, taxes, levies, fines, judgments, settlements, expenses (including legal and accountants' fees and disbursements) and costs (collectively, "Claims"), based on, arising out of or resulting from your use of the Site,


        This says that (among other things) if you buy a ticket on the site, and they make a profit, leading to the need to pay taxes, you need to pay those taxes for them. Really. Read it again !


        I say

        AARRGGH!! No it freaking doesn't. This is one of the most standard clauses in any contract anywhere, and it says that if _I_ incur penalties, taxes, etc as a result of using AA's service, then AA are not responsible.


        I'm not a lawyer, but my job is to provide technical advice on legal contracts that are software and technology related, so I get used to this kind of language. Please try to be accurate...

        • by Repton (60818) on Monday November 04 2002, @05:56AM (#4593275) Homepage

          If I cut out some of the synonyms from the clause (which seems like it should be OK, as I'm only making it say less, not more), I get:

          You agree to [...] indemnify [...] American Airlines [...] from and against any and all [...] taxes [...] resulting from your use of the Site,

          It still seems to me that the earlier poster's interpretation is consistent with the clause: If I use the site (to buy a ticket), and taxes arise from this use of the site (as they would) then I agree to indemnify [dictionary.com] (compensate) American Airlines for those taxes.

          If that's not what it means, then it is not very clear ...

      • by cicadia (231571) on Monday November 04 2002, @06:00AM (#4593282)
        I read the whole thing. There's nothing particularly bad in there.

        Are you sure? You'd better read it again.

        It's still okay? Well, you'd better read it again tomorrow, just to be sure.

        From the agreement:

        American Airlines reserves the right to change this Agreement and to make changes to any of the products or programs described in the Site at any time without notice or liability. Any such revisions are prospectively binding on you and therefore you should periodically visit this page when you use the Site to review the then current Agreement that binds you.
        After reading this far, I came to the conclusion that there's no point reading any further, since they can change the agreement at any time, and you agree to let them.

        They could conceivably have changed the entire text of the agreement between the time you get the original text and the time you post your acceptance. (This is especially likely given the amount of time it would take to read and understand the entire agreement).

        I don't know about your experience with these things, but this looks like about the most offensive language I've ever seen in a set of terms and conditions like this.

  • Heh (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 04 2002, @03:55AM (#4593004)
    Its not like we really read the disclaimers. The only websites I read the disclaimers are porn sites, because you never know if they say, "By clicking here you agree to be billed $29.99"
  • Heh... (Score:5, Funny)

    by BrainInAJar (584756) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:56AM (#4593006)
    I checked the EULA out, and apparantly, it is inconsequential weather or not you click "i agree" or "i do not agree"

    Clicking "i do not agree" still brings you to the same page...
  • by tanveer1979 (530624) <web@@@tanveer...in> on Monday November 04 2002, @03:57AM (#4593008) Homepage Journal
    News Flash: Our site is being attacked by loony hackers. Sorry you cannot book any tickets today.

    Probably the first time in history that an airline had to close down due to slashdot.

  • by Fruny (194844) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:57AM (#4593009)
    According to this :

    O. Take any action that will or could impose an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our site infrastructure.
  • Disclaimer (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cebarro (596789) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:57AM (#4593012)
    Funny - it's quicker to NOT ACCEPT as accepting takes you to the AAdvantage enrollment while NOT accepting drops you right into making a reservation.
  • it is a violation! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by GoatPigSheep (525460) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:58AM (#4593016) Homepage Journal
    However even mentioning this is probably in violation of the text

    taken from the disclaimer:

    American Airlines specifically denies you permission to hyperlink or provide references to the Site, unless you are allowed to do so under a separate written agreement with American Airlines

    so yes, you did violate a portion of it :)

      • by pacc (163090) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:29AM (#4593120) Homepage


        Does this mean Google is infringing?



        Since when are you bound to a contract by reading it?



        " If you do not intend to be legally bound by these terms and conditions, do not access and use the Site [aa.com]. "



        The obvious solution would be to use [216.239.51.100]
        the google cache instead if you want to find out if it's legal for you to go to the Site [aa.com] at all.

  • by rehabdoll (221029) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:59AM (#4593020) Homepage
    "You may not copy, display, distribute, download, license, modify, publish, re-post, reproduce, reuse, sell, transmit, use to create a derivative work, or otherwise use the content of the Site for public or commercial purposes. Nothing on the Site shall be construed to confer any grant or license of any intellectual property rights, whether by estoppel, by implication, or otherwise."

    If you cant even display it, how is it legal to even review the agreement? :D
  • by gafferted (560272) on Monday November 04 2002, @03:59AM (#4593021)
    Clicking "I do not accept" appears to still grant access to the site.

    So I can still book a flight without agreeing to donate my firstborn to their catering department.

    Andrew

  • by roguerez (319598) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:00AM (#4593028) Homepage
    "You're not allowed to use our planes to fly them into buildings."
  • I decided to scroll around it for a minute and happened upon this gem:

    You agree and understand that you will not bring against AMR Corporation, American Airlines, or any of its affiliated entities, agents, directors, employees, and/or officers any class action lawsuit related to your access to, dealings with, or use of the Site.

    I mean, that's stupid. If your incompetent network admin leaks the travel schedules of me and 10,000 other Americans, we "voluntarily" waive the right to sue you?

    If I was me (and I am), I would simply choose another airline who doesn't want to try and hoodwink me into something I will regret.

    • by thejk (575418) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:14AM (#4593078) Homepage
      Actually, they probably cannot enforce that, if it comes to it. For a reference, see the recent ruling [uscourts.gov] for Comb v. PayPal. Basically, you cannot make end users give up their basic legal rights through EULA, etc., if I understand the ruling correctly. But, hey, IANAL. Somewhat off-topic, it really bothers me that EULAs and most legal documents are, well, written in abstruse legalese. Is anyone aware of a movement in the US to limit the use of complex legalese in favor of plain engligh? I have found the following sites on google, but they are mostly for other countries -- except one that refers to the Michigan Bar effort.
      • UK: www.plainenglish.co.uk/law.html
      • India: http://www.globallawreview.com/lr8.html
      • Michigan Bar: http://www.michbar.org/committees/penglish/columns /131.html
  • by KarmaBitch (562896) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:01AM (#4593033)

    American Airlines specifically denies you permission to hyperlink or provide references to the Site

    Oops. Sorry Slashdot.. You've been bad


    American Airlines will not treat as confidential any communications you send to us by electronic mail or otherwise. American Airlines has no obligation to refrain from publishing, reproducing, or otherwise using your communications in any way and for any purpose.

    Thank You for respecting my privacy

    ------------

    An example of lawyers that don't understand technology

    Download or upload files that may damage the operation of another's computer, such as computer viruses, corrupt files, or similar software


    When was the last time you downloaded something that hurt a website :D

    Ohh.. I'm sure there's more intresting stuff in there... And I'm also pretty damn sure it's not the longest EULA...

    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 04 2002, @04:07AM (#4593060)
      >> Download or upload files that may damage the operation of another's computer, such as computer viruses, corrupt files, or similar software

      >When was the last time you downloaded something that hurt a website :D


      Um, about 10 seconds ago. It's called the slashdot effect. :-p
  • The law is lacking (Score:4, Insightful)

    by weiyuent (257436) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:06AM (#4593055) Journal
    This is a perfect example of how inadequate laws make life cumbersome for both corporations and their customers.

    From the company's standpoint, EULA's could be a real headache, because the company has to hammer out pages upon pages of legalese to cover its own arse.

    From the consumer's perspective, ever-expanding EULA's are just as much a nuisance as a potential pitfall when not read properly. It becomes impractical to read them, yet the less you read them before agreeing, the more you expose yourself to being taken advantage of.

    The solution is more laws and better laws, and this is where the government CAN do good. If most things that are common sense can be nailed down in public law (i.e. we're not responsible if you scald yourself with hot coffee, we will not spam you, etc.), then EULAs could be trimmed and focused on the unique essentials of a particular situation. That would benefit both consumers and corporations. The only losers in this situation would be all the parasitic lawyers and the sneaky folks with dubious EULAs (*cough* Microsoft *cough*).

  • by Nept (21497) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:14AM (#4593077) Journal
    I think the key line in that agreement is
    Likewise, [...] this agreement will be considered broadened to the extent needed to permit [...] third parties to operate within the terms of a written agreement they have entered into with us.
    In other words, this policy you have to agree to is only valid as long as it doesn't interfere with agreements AA has and will make with 3rd parties. Which basically means, you're agreeing to anything that AA and its partners agree to.
    It reminds me of a lot of EULAs/policies where there is a long list of who the company might and might not share information with and may seem very stringent, but at the very end of the list is a short give away line to the effect that they can share the information with anybody.

    Also, it would be illegal according to the terms of the agreement to post this policy here, as in their policy you agree not to "copy, display, distribute, download, license, modify, publish, re-post, reproduce, reuse, sell, transmit" any of their HTML code or "the content of the Site" for public or commercial purposes.

  • The T&Cs say you must not: M. Monitor or copy any Content by using any manual process, or any robot, spider, or other automatic device, without first obtaining American Airlines' prior written consent.. This means that you can't visit the site to read it, surely since that involves monitoring the site with a manual process (i.e. reading it).

    Or how about the fact that you must not: O. Take any action that will or could impose an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our site infrastructure. So no posting on Slashdot either!

  • In related news... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Jugalator (259273) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:15AM (#4593083) Journal
    Something similar has been posted here before: Longest email disclaimer awards [slashdot.org]. The longest disclaimer was apparently 7K large and the unlucky "winner" was UBS Warburg [ubswarburg.com].

    Also, an analysis of stupid e-mail disclaimers [goldmark.org].
  • Couldn't they provide a version of their 'terms & conditions' which includes a little video with airhostesses miming actions to clarify it...

    "Our trademarks and logos are protected *here* and *here* ... When you reach paragraph 17 masks will automatically drop from the compartment above. Please ensure that your rights have been securely passed to us before helping those sitting next to you ... etc"

    That way everyone could click on the "I accept" after ignoring the whole thing with a clear conscience!
  • by antdude (79039) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:23AM (#4593106) Homepage Journal
    I found it many years ago:

    This product is meant for educational purposes only. Any resemblance to real persons living or dead is purely coincidental. Void where prohibited. Some assembly required. List each check separately by bank number. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during shipment. Use only as directed. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Postage will be paid by addressee. Subject to CAB approval. This is not an offer to sell securities. Apply only to affected area. May be too intense for some viewers. Do not stamp. Use other side for additional listings. For recreational use only. Do not disturb. All models over 18 years of age. If condition persists, consult your physician. No user-serviceable parts inside. Freshest if eaten before date on carton. Subject to change without notice. Times approximate. Simulated picture. No postage necessary if mailed in the United States. Please remain seated until the ride has come to a complete stop. Breaking seal constitutes acceptance of agreement. For off-road use only. As seen on TV. One size fits all. Many suitcases look alike. Contains a substantial amount of non-tobacco ingredients. Colors may fade. We have sent the forms which seem right for you. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Not affiliated with the American Red Cross. Drop in any mailbox. Edited for television. Keep cool; process promptly. Post office will not deliver without postage. List was current at time of printing. Return to sender, no forwarding order on file, unable to forward. Not responsible for direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages resulting from any defect, error or failure to perform. At participating locations only. Not the Beatles. Penalty for private use. See label for sequence. Substantial penalty for early withdrawal. Do not write below this line. Falling rock. Lost ticket pays maximum rate. Your canceled check is your receipt. Add toner. Place stamp here. Avoid contact with skin. Sanitized for your protection. Be sure each item is properly endorsed. Sign here without admitting guilt. Slightly higher west of the Mississippi. Employees and their families are not eligible. Beware of dog. Contestants have been briefed on some questions before the show. Limited time offer, call now to ensure prompt delivery. You must be present to win. No passes accepted for this engagement. No purchase necessary. Processed at location stamped in code at top of carton. Shading within a garment may occur. Use only in a well-ventilated area. Keep away from fire or flames. Replace with same type. Approved for veterans. Booths for two or more. Check here if tax deductible. Some equipment shown is optional. Price does not include taxes. No Canadian coins. Not recommended for children. Prerecorded for this time zone. Reproduction strictly prohibited. No solicitors. No alcohol, dogs or horses. No anchovies unless otherwise specified. Restaurant package, not for resale. List at least two alternate dates. First pull up, then pull down. Call toll free number before digging. Driver does not carry cash. Some of the trademarks mentioned in this product appear for identification purposes only. Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear. Record additional transactions on back of previous stub. Unix is a registered trademark of AT&T. Do not fold, spindle or mutilate. No transfers issued until the bus comes to a complete stop. Package sold by weight, not volume. Your mileage may vary. Known as Hellman's east of the Rockies. Beware of greeks bearing gifts. Beware of gifts bearing greeks. This side up. Don't take any wooden nickels. Don't take candy from strangers. Void where prohibited. Caveat Emptor (Buyer beware) Caveat Vendor (Beware of street people). Donde esta el bano. Beware of DOS. Look both ways before crossing the street. All your base are belong to us. Always wear safety belt. Always wear deodorant. Don't forget to breathe. If you park, don't drink...accidents cause people. This supersedes all previous notices.

    This modified disclaimer may not be copied without the expressed written consent of whoever I stole it from.

  • by tulare (244053) <(moc.tahepuat) (ta) (demmaps)> on Monday November 04 2002, @04:26AM (#4593109) Journal
    I mean, come on. Has it dawned on anyone else out there that these butt-covering disclaimers are becoming meaningless? What I'd really like to see would be a court opinion to the general idea of "the agreement was written in Legalese, which is no more readable to the person agreeing to the contract than Latin or Esparanto. Given that the person agreeing to the contract could not reasonably be expected to hire an attorney to understand his or her rights before clicking OK in order to buy airline tickets (or install Windows, ahem), the EULA as given is essentially an unenforcable abrogation of constitutionally protected rights. Therefore, the EULA in its entirety is invalid."

    Of course, some fucknut tort lawyers would have to get real jobs, but I promise to lose 10^-30 seconds of sleep over that one.

    Yeah, I know, I'm dreaming. Is that my alarm clock?
  • No web crawlers? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by riflemann (190895) <`ten.iitcac.bb' `ta' `nnamelfir'> on Monday November 04 2002, @04:26AM (#4593111)
    Interesting to note from the agreement:

    [You shall not] Monitor or copy any Content by using any manual process, or any robot, spider, or other automatic device, without first obtaining American Airlines' prior written consent.

    However:

    $ wget http://www.aa.com/robots.txt
    --10:23:00-- http://www.aa.com:80/robots.txt
    => `robots.txt' Connecting to www.aa.com:80... connected!
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not found
    10:23:01 ERROR 404: Not found.

    So they've not got a robots.txt file. Do they expect web crawlers to read and understand this also??

  • by coene (554338) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:35AM (#4593133)
    "You agree that you will not Misuse the Site. "Misuse" includes, but is not limited to, using the Site to do any of the following:"

    You know the EULA is too long when on a "you will not" clause, the bullets go all the way to the letter S
  • Anecdote... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by shic (309152) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:38AM (#4593144)
    While an undergrad, one course (taught in Prolog) required all the students to take a given program, amend it and provide hardcopy traces of the output after each of the 5 stages to show that the program "still worked." Leaving aside the inherent flaws (which I could argue mean the original program could never "work!") I stumbled upon the documentary requirement placed on students. Two of us produced the first phase of the first part's printed documentation and a projection that a complete answer would cost tens of thousands of pounds in paper and ink and take several years to print even given exclusive use of the university's fastest printers. When challenged, the lecturer (who set this dastardly task) explained that all he really wanted was a 'heavy' submission from each student - in order to dissuade moderators from questioning the grades he deemed appropriate as they would have no desire to wade through a few hundred pages of output before making their case!

    The sooner people realise that documentary complexity and volume doesn't gain advantages the better. It would be great to see a shift in opinion about such treatise requiring that the document be taken as a whole - and considered void in it's entirety should it contain anything redundant, unnecessarily convoluted or not legally binding. If this doesn't happen, I can only envisage licenses plummet further towards their own obsolescence.

  • by harlows_monkeys (106428) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:47AM (#4593163) Homepage
    I went to the American Airline site, and the story is simply wrong. You can use the site just fine, without ever seeing that agreement. You only see the agreement when you try to sign up for their frequent flyer program.


    There is nothing at all newsworthy here, for nerds, or anyone else. Come on, editors...don't accept junk like this.

  • by jericho4.0 (565125) on Monday November 04 2002, @05:32AM (#4593242)
    The scariest part of this EULA?
    You agree that Texas law governs this Agreement's interpretation
    It doesn't matter if you're a minor, retarded, or insane. We'll get you.
  • Mailorder privacy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by newfoundry (559985) on Monday November 04 2002, @06:27AM (#4593330) Homepage
    [from their privacy policy [aa.com]...] "Protecting your privacy. Your privacy is important to us... " [unless you've read the eula [aa.com]...] "American Airlines will not treat as confidential any communications you send to us by electronic mail or otherwise. American Airlines has no obligation to refrain from publishing, reproducing, or otherwise using your communications in any way and for any purpose." [and if you want to opt out you'll need a stamp and a lot of patience [aa.com]...] "While we believe this disclosure of your information will result in opportunities that may be of interest to you, you have the right to tell us not to give your information to any third party. If you want American to keep all of your information confidential and not share it with any third party, please mail your written request to American Airlines AAdvantage Program; P.O.Box 619688; DFW Airport, Texas 75261-9688. Your request must include your name, AAdvantage number, mailing address and must be signed. Please allow six weeks to process your request. "

    Airmail, anyone?

  • by nachoboy (107025) on Monday November 04 2002, @06:38AM (#4593344)
    ...by a long shot. Check out their service agreement [netsol.com]. A whopping 237 paragraphs, 31,999 words, and 202,556 characters.
  • by Nept (21497) on Monday November 04 2002, @06:38AM (#4593347) Journal
    cause it's AA. and we know RIAA and MPAA are evil, so AA must be the root of all evil

  • by migstradamus (472166) on Monday November 04 2002, @07:15AM (#4593411) Homepage
    " O. Take any action that will or could impose an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our site infrastructure."
  • by Dexter's Laboratory (608003) on Monday November 04 2002, @07:30AM (#4593432)
    Somewhere in the middle, you start to see interesting things included in the text. In the 87th paragraph there is a rather delicious sushi recipe, in the 90th paragraph, a Seinfeld quote, and in the 92nd, it said "Have you read this far, I'll buy you a Big Mac". Not many people have noticed this because it's quite the enormous mass of text.
  • by Bob9113 (14996) on Monday November 04 2002, @08:24AM (#4593561) Homepage
    The PayPal Agreement [paypal.com] is 373 paragraphs, 19,127 words, 119,761 characters.
        • by Qrlx (258924) on Monday November 04 2002, @04:17AM (#4593093) Homepage Journal
          I think it's IBM that when you are downloading a new BIOS for your ThinkPad or whatever, you actually have to type "agree" for the installer to make the boot floppy with the new BIOS image on it.

          What I'm not understanding is why don't we DOS their lawyers, by asking a LOT of technical questions about this "agreement." Like call the 800 number and tell them you have a question about para. 14, line 8 in the online agreement, and you'd like some clarification. Then send certified mail asking the same thing.

          It wouldn't acomplish much, but it would make some poor schmuck's day at the office more miserable. Schadenfeude or whatever you call it. It would also be cool to know if there could be such thing of a write-in slashdot effect.

          By the way, did you know that when you call AA to book a flight, you could be talking to a prison inmate? [africana.com] I feel warm and fuzzy just thinking about telling convicted felons the exact dates I won't be in my home.